Wolves 2 - Watford 2 a full blooded contest verdict thread

[Deutsch Wolf]

Late to the party here but I thought we played pretty well, definitely two points dropped in the end. Henry as the 10 worked ok and gave us a much better footballer in there. We always look better when Price is playing. Not sure on the 3/10 ratings for Doyle, he actually did more in that 10 minutes than he did in most of his starts in L1.

Two bad goals to be conceding - Doherty playing Vydra on for the first (he actually played ok otherwise, no good if you cost the team a goal though) and Kuszczak has to take better charge of the situation on the second. Disappointing to lose goals to straight balls right down the middle.

Still plenty of points there for the taking, think we need all six from the next two.

 

[Quirkafleeg]

This thread is getting funnier and funnier...

http://www.footballforums.net/showthread.php/312374-The-Wulfs-v-Watford?p=9318147#post9318147

Mainly the last page... Great comedy value.

 

[Penk Wolf]

Such a shit 2nd goal to concede. Batth and Stearman both caught flat footed and Tommy K should have been out a lot quicker.

Funny how they don't show Sako's sending off.

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

Wolves comfirm appeal against Sako's red card

 

[Kenny]

Being heard tomorrow.

Wolves submitting video evidence tomorrow as well to back up the written appeal.

 

[Jinky]

Absolutely shocking highlights.

 

[FrankMunro-371]

Being heard tomorrow.

Wolves submitting video evidence tomorrow as well to back up the written appeal.

If the referee confirms that he got it wrong, then it will be straight forward.

 

[darlowolf64]

If the referee confirms that he got it wrong, then it will be straight forward.

and if he refuses to change his mind?

 

[Penk Wolf]

If the referee confirms that he got it wrong, then it will be straight forward.

I already know that answer to this. And if he says he's right?

 

[FrankMunro-371]

and if he refuses to change his mind?

Then the panel will watch footage of the incident and make their decision based on that, and also the referee's report.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

Absolutely shocking highlights.

Not sure what else you were expecting from "minute highlights" tbh. I suppose they could have crammed more in and sped it up Benny Hill style.

We seem to have stopped putting up 3-5 minute highlight videos on YouTube - a retrograde step from us in terms of social media, presumably as no-one subscribes to crappy Wolves player any more. I'd much rather have the proper videos up and do away with Goal/Fan Cam which offer pretty much nothing of any interest.

 

[FrankMunro-371]

I already know that answer to this. And if he says he's right?

I would be disappointed if he did say he was right. He must now realise that it was wrong to send off Sako.

 

[Penk Wolf]

I would be disappointed if he did say he was right. He must now realise that it was wrong to send off Sako.

I assume if he does he will get highly reprimanded?

 

[Tredman]

I assume if he does he will get highly reprimanded?

Suspended I'd hope.

 

[Alan]

Pretty silly that the ref's opinion comes into this at all. Just look at the tape and it's clear what happens.

 

[FrankMunro-371]

From what I have heard the referee will be standing by his decision to send off Sako.

 

[Kenny]

From what I have heard the referee will be standing by his decision to send off Sako.

Then he needs sacking. As bad as the cheating fuck if that is the case.

 

[malta mick]

From what I have heard the referee will be standing by his decision to send off Sako.

In that case he should be sacked for gross incompetence (in the first place) and stupidity (in the review of video evidence)

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

From what I have heard the referee will be standing by his decision to send off Sako.

Unbelievable.

 

[Tredman]

Pathetic, incompetent cheating nob