I'm in the 'haven't really made a call about this coach' camp. I don't know if he'll be a success or not. I suspect that he won't, but I'm not writing that chapter of the book yet. Unlike some people who seem to already know he'll be a failure for some reason and are actively looking for points to score to prove they are right. As far as I'm aware there isn't anyone who has said he's going to be a success?
Few managerial appointments or player signings are sure-fire successes or failures, but surely it's about probability and ambition.
Would you be happy with Warnock or Dean Smith or Steve Bruce? Of course not, you'd say they were unsuitable and/or had multiple failures to their name, and were just unimaginative relegation firefighting signings.
Would you be happy giving them a chance, a run of games to prove what they could do? Would you ignore their previous and allow them a fresh slate? They could well do a decent job, and the Wolves position could be a good fit. It's not an exact science, but the probability would certainly go against them.
O'Neil may turn out to be a success here, but as he doesn't really have much of a managerial record, we have nothing to base our expectations on, so we're really just putting all our faith in Hobbs' judgement. That he's spotted a future star in Gary, and hopefully it's a better call than when Jeff spotted a future star in Fabio.
But, of course, it's not really an ambitious, positive appointment is it? Cos that would go against the grain of how the club is clearly being run right now. It's not like we've lost Potter and have lined up De Zerbi (since we all love Brighton comparisons so much), because we've kept our eye on him, seen what he can do and want him to take the team onto another level, based on previous achievements and standing in the game.
We've had to get someone unattached at the last minute, fancied someone British and who wasn't too mutated, and GON probably came across as a nice fella at interview.
Do these kind of cheap punts really pay off very often? No, not really, otherwise every PL team would do it and not bother employing top manager's on millions a year. Yet some on here seem surprised when cynical voices call it out as a ropey appointment from the start?