Brighton 2-2 Wolves: Verdict Thread

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Don’t be a dick.

Firstly I don't put you in the same category as some of the other posters on here.

I took umbrage with your "joyless" comment on Saturday, because no matter what is happening, if we come from 2-0 behind to get a point (when we are absolutely desperate for them) i cannot for the life of me ever consider that joyless!

So when i see a picture of fellow Wolves fans going wild with joy, i immediately thought of you.

It's a great photo isn't it?

 

[prawnking]

Mol mix is often (rightly) criticised for being a forum that is just a message board, that has little to no actual discourse or conversation, if you'd prefer that, perhaps you should sign up for that forum instead?

If i disagree with a view, i will say so, and i will give my reasons why. There is nothing wrong with that, i make no apology for that, in the same way as you make little apology for calling me a cunt last year because i disagreed with your view (which frankly look ridiculous, especially now) regarding Palestine and Israel, perhaps we should all behave like that instead?

Weird that your response is that I should leave the forum, and then some waffle about Israel and Palestine.

Not really proportionate or relevant.

Maybe reflect on why you're rubbing multiple people up the wrong way instead

 

[prawnking]

Firstly I don't put you in the same category as some of the other posters on here.

I took umbrage with your "joyless" comment on Saturday, because no matter what is happening, if we come from 2-0 behind to get a point (when we are absolutely desperate for them) i cannot for the life of me ever consider that joyless!

So when i see a picture of fellow Wolves fans going wild with joy, i immediately thought of you.

It's a great photo isn't it?

I mean, this is literal WUMming.

Let people have their own POV ffs

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Weird that your response is that I should leave the forum, and then some waffle about Israel and Palestine.

Not really proportionate or relevant.

Maybe reflect on why you're rubbing multiple people up the wrong way instead

I think it's weird you telling me I am being contrary, on a wolves forum, a place where we are here to chat, agree and disagree about all things Wolves.

It's not waffle about Israel and Palestine is it, it's pertinent as it's about an exchange between me and you, where you didn't like what i said so you were abusive.

Perhaps YOU should reflect on that, instead of just coming at me without actually countering my posts, what was the point?

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

I mean, this is literal WUMming.

Let people have their own POV ffs

Do you understand the hypocrisy here?

You posted saying i shouldn't post my view, then tell me i should let other people have their own POV?

 

[prawnking]

I thought you were the guy who loved lecturing about 'nuance'? Jesus Christ, where's that Ignore button

 

[Tony Towner]

Do you understand the hypocrisy here?

You posted saying i shouldn't post my view, then tell me i should let other people have their own POV?

Post what you want, when you want, how you want, we all should within reason, but that joyless image contradicts

"I in no way am trolling, intentionally winding people up"

At least own it.

 

[Trips]

Can we stop derailing the thread with this please, thanks

 

[The Bear]

Seconded. If you have a problem with a particular poster use the report or the ignore function.

 

[Boozad]

If that's what he was referring to, then fine.

However that thread was 6 weeks ago, i didn't read it or respond to it, and we've worn that kit more than once since that post anyway, so when i saw that post regarding the kit being illegal, i thought it was "random".

I have no idea why that made you jump up and down, i truly believe that if someone else had made that post you wouldn't have even blinked.

Jump up and down? Please point out any of the wording of that post that was me jumping up and down.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Jump up and down? Please point out any of the wording of that post that was me jumping up and down.

It was also in reference to your post #2802 as well.

 

[Boozad]

It was also in reference to your post #2802 as well.

This is the 252nd post in this thread. Give me more of an idea. If you’re on about the one where I asked you quite politely about if you thought the way you reacted to people was fine when questioning how others reacted to you, again please point out where I was “jumping up and down”.

 

[Del Woppio]

Can we just not. Fuck banning people, if drive cunts away and just leave half dozen people throwing shit at each other

 

[Boozad]

Don’t worry about me bringing the tone down if that was aimed at me. I’m done and out.

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

I think this is at least in part because you are pissed off you were made to look ridiculous about your "smug" and condescending view that putting someone on Sa to protect him would give penalties away.

If i make a statement, am ridiculed for it, and then in some way i'm proven at least partly right, i will say so.

I hope that's ok with you Paddy.

I had forgotten about it to be honest.

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

Seeing the admin forum and decision overnight I doubt I will be causing you much of a problem going forward anyway EP. This place has gone to the dogs.

 

[Jinky]

I don’t want to derail a thread, but fairly confident I speak for most when I ask for the permanent Johnny ban to be reconsidered?

He has his moments but I’d argue from a Wolves perspective, he’s an invaluable member of the forum with his input.

Would be sad to see him banned permanently.

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

I wholeheartedly agree, but that boat would appear to have sailed.

 

[Derby Wolf]

I don’t want to derail a thread, but fairly confident I speak for most when I ask for the permanent Johnny ban to be reconsidered?

He has his moments but I’d argue from a Wolves perspective, he’s an invaluable member of the forum with his input.

Would be sad to see him banned permanently.

Agreed, he oversteps occasionally but I like reading his posts when it's kept on football.

If you're banning one you've got to ban the other, two (mainly) posters have contributed to the forum being utterly unreadable of late so both should face a sanction. Even allowing for past conduct, it doesn't have to be the same sanction but there should be something.

It shouldn't mean you then have carte blanche to post anything you like but I suspect people might remember this when it's forum renewals time and it'll be a harder sell and then what does that mean for the forum?

Oh, and while we're at it, why have we got a moderator who hasn't logged in since June? I appreciate admins and mods are volunteers but surely a basic pre-requisite is signing onto the forum more than every 4 months.

 

[prawnking]

I don’t want to derail a thread, but fairly confident I speak for most

Er...you don't speak for Mark's emoji's ACTUALLY