Elephant Pyjamas
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,334
- Reaction score
- 10,024
What's wrong with saying that!??Pretty sure I heard him say, ‘some of it was on me’ on 5live, he’s seriously deluded.
What's wrong with saying that!??Pretty sure I heard him say, ‘some of it was on me’ on 5live, he’s seriously deluded.
Well he's saying he knew in advance it was wrong but did it anyway.He's saying he thinks he made a mistake? In a normal walk of life that's a quality, not something to be criticised?
Palace have only conceded 11 this season so far , impressive for a team that far down the table , they have only scored 5 mind you .
I’d rather a manager that follows his head not his heart.He's saying he was caught in two minds in which one he should go with?
That's a normal human situation/emotion.
Of course he probably shouldn't be admitting this as a manager. But that's a different argument.
They'll be looking to the next game to kick start their season, I think it might happen.Weird turnaround for them seeing how well they finished last season. Couldn't stop scoring, and now they look quite poor.
An excellent observation. I loved MM but it was clear those two late goals were papering over huge gaps, just like today.Wolves 2 - Swansea 2
Learn your lesson and sack him now before it's too late
Make no mistake, that Swansea game was way worse (not least as they were a fairly unheralded newly promoted team at the time, Brighton are recognisably levels above that) and way more poisonous than anything O'Neil has ever or will ever face.An excellent observation. I loved MM but it was clear those two late goals were papering over huge gaps, just like today.
Surely it’s all on him.What's wrong with saying that!??
No. It isn't. It's the exact argument.He's saying he was caught in two minds in which one he should go with?
That's a normal human situation/emotion.
Of course he probably shouldn't be admitting this as a manager. But that's a different argument.
Not all of it, no.Surely it’s all on him.
Not from what people have said above?No. It isn't. It's the exact argument.
They somehow fucked up a 4 on 1 and we went forward and scored a deflected equaliser seconds later, it's lucky as fuckWhy is it a fluke?
Standard manager stuff trying to play it down. Nothing put the ordinary there.“I know there'll be a lot made of the next games. They're not ‘must wins’"
Er, Gary Gary. I have some news for you. You might like to sit down.
Fluke/lucky it’s up there but we have to take it.Why is it a fluke?
He’s not just taking responsibility though, he’s actually saying he didn’t think what he did - five at the back - would work. Yes he’s responsible but he’s also stupid and I’d rather not have a stupid manager in charge of my team.Not from what people have said above?
If people think he shouldn't have said that, I agree.
But him going through those thought processes he described is absolutely normal.
It’s the type of mistake though. Based in sentiment, not logic. Essentially the lads were unlucky last week so I don’t want to drop any of them, even though I don’t think 5atb is the way to go. Looks weak leadershipHe's saying he thinks he made a mistake? In a normal walk of life that's a quality, not something to be criticised?
Meh, many of the goals we have conceded this season have had an element of luck/bad luck attributed to them, how many deflected goals have we conceded? They weren't flukes, it's just football.They somehow fucked up a 4 on 1 and we went forward and scored a deflected equaliser seconds later, it's lucky as fuck