AndyWolves
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 16,635
- Reaction score
- 7,190
How are var decisions made for objective stuff? Is it just one bloke?
Different ref each match, isn't it?How are var decisions made for objective stuff? Is it just one bloke?
There's a lead ref for each game with technical assistance I believeHow are var decisions made for objective stuff? Is it just one bloke?
It was Mike Dean so no is the answer to that.Is be really interested to know the culture of how top referees operate. Are they willing to receive feedback and have errors highlighted to them?
What annoys me about the penalty decision is we just keep schtum and accept it. Davis should have been calling the ref and VAR out in the media after the game.
Both Lampard and Conte have done it recently amongst others, and it highlighted decisions going against them. Probably meant others were looked at more thoroughly next time for them.
The problem with VAR in the English game is the attitude of the referees overseeing it. It’s ego over fairness.It works in other countries. It works in MLS. Sure, some decisions still end up baffling the viewer but by and large it has made the game more fair.
Frankly, the fact that MLS can get VAR correct, yet the FA/PGMOL/whoever the fuck can't is embarrassing for them.
It'd take some convincing to get me to believe that English refs are particularly unique in this regard, if I'm honest.The problem with VAR in the English game is the attitude of the referees overseeing it. It’s ego over fairness.
What I'd be interested to know, but never will is how much refs don't give to let VAR to take the decision off them, particularly on handballsI should probably also state that even if VAR was run properly, I’d still be against it.
Okay-ish and yes, respectively.Totally missed the game entirely yesterday and not seen any highlights - how was the back 3? Semedo improved?
We looked much more structured and drilled in playing a back 5. Which is a little odd as we've not trained in it for many months!Totally missed the game entirely yesterday and not seen any highlights - how was the back 3? Semedo improved?
Perhaps shows that the training since we last played 5 at the back has been shit?We looked much more structured and drilled in playing a back 5. Which is a little odd as we've not trained in it for many months!
Although it could have been because we just sat deep and tried to hit on the counter.
Or that Collins and Kilman aren't the saviours.Perhaps shows that the training since we last played 5 at the back has been shit?
80%... training... attack...Perhaps shows that the training since we last played 5 at the back has been shit?