• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Football News Thread 2017/18 - everything not Wolves

Albion have sacked their chairman (John Williams) and CEO.
 
The new owner obviously knows nothing about football so he's gone for experience in the game to run the club...fine in principle but appointing a 77 year old is faintly ridiculous. It told in those two decisions.

All too late now of course.
 
What does the owner think can change between now and the end of the season that can keep them up? The damage is already done - unless they're planning for next season in the Championship?
 
What does the owner think can change between now and the end of the season that can keep them up? The damage is already done - unless they're planning for next season in the Championship?

It is clear planning ahead (and hoping for a fooking miracle in the meantime) but he will want everything in place to get them straight back up.
 
Gordon Taylor paid 2.2m by the PFA.

20 times the amount they've allocated for research into head injuries/concussion.

Ironic this is coming out today with Mason retiring from head injury.

On Twitter I've suggested mandatory retirements for footballing organisations, stops greedy old men profiteering for one and secondly the game doesn't pass them by. Never happen like.
 
Gordon Taylor paid 2.2m by the PFA.

20 times the amount they've allocated for research into head injuries/concussion.

Ironic this is coming out today with Mason retiring from head injury.

On Twitter I've suggested mandatory retirements for footballing organisations, stops greedy old men profiteering for one and secondly the game doesn't pass them by. Never happen like.

I agree with your sentiments on Taylor. On head injuries, the initial research has been done, it is now about wider research into head injuries in football and what actually can be done about it without banning heading. The short answer is absolutely nothing as football is a collision sport and knocks to the head will happen as long as there are contested headers. There isn't the need to throw hundreds of thousands of pounds into it.
 
The winners of the latest auction for Premier League TV rights are being announced today. Lots of rumours going around that Amazon have won at least one of the packages (for some midweek and bank holiday fixtures, apparently).
 
I agree with your sentiments on Taylor. On head injuries, the initial research has been done, it is now about wider research into head injuries in football and what actually can be done about it without banning heading. The short answer is absolutely nothing as football is a collision sport and knocks to the head will happen as long as there are contested headers. There isn't the need to throw hundreds of thousands of pounds into it.

Really? I find this view a little surprising to be honest. If there is a link between heading the ball and a person's health then we need to know.

With the amount of kids who regularly play the game we also need to know at what age heading the ball is "safe". That is, if we don't already know
 
Even if you don't change the rules of the game based on what heading the ball does to the human brain, if it is harmful people need to know.
 
The winners of the latest auction for Premier League TV rights are being announced today. Lots of rumours going around that Amazon have won at least one of the packages (for some midweek and bank holiday fixtures, apparently).
First 5 packages announced.
BT have 1 (32 games) and Sky 4 (128 games)

Final 2 not announced but do have multiple bidders
These packages are the ones that will show every game being played on Bank Holidays and midweek.
 
It's strange. Last time they announced a mega deal it brought it home to us how we had missed the boat big time whilst the Baggies and Stokies would ride off into the sunset, our paths never to cross again.

Funny how things change, maybe we are going up at just the right time!
 
It's strange. Last time they announced a mega deal it brought it home to us how we had missed the boat big time whilst the Baggies and Stokies would ride off into the sunset, our paths never to cross again.

Funny how things change, maybe we are going up at just the right time!

Don't think it gains teams already in the Prem a competitive advantage tbf, they're all splitting that pie so it doesn't really get any easier for them.

I still can't imagine that Stoke won't get to safety somehow.
 
First 5 packages announced.
BT have 1 (32 games) and Sky 4 (128 games)

Final 2 not announced but do have multiple bidders
These packages are the ones that will show every game being played on Bank Holidays and midweek.

26 years of PL football not one game has ever been shown on free TV state of affairs really and not daft enough to think it would ever change.
 
What it means is that once you're up there, you don't need much by way of outside investment unless you're really going all out to challenge the top four (which not many clubs really fancy, they heed the example of Leeds, although they did it through leveraging which has its own risks). You can own a club, it'll produce a return, give your businesses exposure if you have other interests and you don't have to fund it too much. Whereas back in the day, you could only afford big signings if the board pressed the button, preferably if you had a really rich guy running the show. As the owner you can cream off whatever percentage you like, with whatever knock-on effect that has on the team. Mike Ashley doesn't fund Newcastle. The Glazers don't fund Man Utd. Lai doesn't fund West Brom. The Pozzos no longer have any need to fund Watford. And so on.

You don't really accelerate miles ahead of Championship teams forever more. You can buy expensive players but they aren't going to stay if you go down. You can't really replace them either. You won't save the money that TV income brings because you'll just go down, so it all gets spent one way or another.

The easiest way to think about it is if I earn £20k a year and have £5k worth of bills a year, and you earn £100k a year and have £85k worth of bills. You should be miles richer than me, but you aren't. You have nicer things for now - which the £85k pays for - but if you lose that £100k a year job then they all have to go and you need to replace them with stuff befitting your new, much lower salary.
 
I get Cardiff are playing tonight as a game in hand but why are Derby and Sheff Weds given it takes those two to 32 games for the season ahead of the rest of the league?

Not that it matters just find it odd.
 
Back
Top