AndyWolves
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 16,656
- Reaction score
- 7,214
I highly doubt that made a bit of difference to a loan feeWell it does, doesn’t it? Money comes from somewhere. If wed finished 17th last year, would’ve been less income and maybe we wouldn’t have paid the 6m loan fee for trincao? We will never know
O absolutely. But I’d imagine klopp didn’t see him as a ‘key player’ in the style he’d want to implement.Depends if the people that are seen as key players, largely due to performances under a different manager desiring a different style, can adapt and continue to perform as well for a new manager wanting a different style.
Liverpool were transformed when they sold Coutinho, a risky move at face value as he'd been central to most of their attacking player prior to Klopp arriving but he didn't have the right style for the new man, or even really fit any particular position. Sometimes failing to make those bold decisions can be really detrimental, clinging onto the past and preventing you from fully embracing the new ideas.
Just playing devils advocate, the money will have come from somewhere. To say where we finish in the prem and the money doesn’t impact what we do is just silly us what I’m getting atI highly doubt that made a bit of difference to a loan fee
It's an absolute joke. Similar ridiculous decisions happen so often now and they're against us every fucking time.
Semedo isn't playing on both the 26th and 28th so wanted Hoever to not come in cold is my guessI'm still trying to work out Hoever over Semedo. Anyone know why?
It’s true but Klopp was backed by his teams board and owners to buy some talent. Bruno has been told the old mother Hubbard story so far which is , as you know , bollocks
Coutinho played all the time under Klopp and was good. He went because it was a stupid bid, not because he didn't fit the system.
I don't think any of our current players fit that description anyway, bar maybe Adama who probably doesn't suit anyone properly.
I don’t think you’re aloneThe handball decision was absolutely transparent and a clear indicator that the refereeing in this league is absolutely corrupt, as bad as the penalty decision against City. The league is now manufactured, the decisions will always go in favour of the 'big clubs'. I don't think I;m renewing next season, I love watching my club but I'm at the point where I refuse to pay the thick end of a grand to watch bent fucks make sure the status quo isn't upset. It's fucking disgraceful and nobody seems to want to do anything about it.
I feel similar. It was clear handball from 50 yards away. Did VAR even look at it? If they did the VAR ref is bent, if they didn't he's bent. There is simply no other explanation.The handball decision was absolutely transparent and a clear indicator that the refereeing in this league is absolutely corrupt, as bad as the penalty decision against City. The league is now manufactured, the decisions will always go in favour of the 'big clubs'. I don't think I;m renewing next season, I love watching my club but I'm at the point where I refuse to pay the thick end of a grand to watch bent fucks make sure the status quo isn't upset. It's fucking disgraceful and nobody seems to want to do anything about it.
You could clearly see he nearly caught it from where I was sat, if the cunt Coote didn't see it from where he was then he's not fit to referee, if he did he's bent. And the refs manning VAR have already proved they're bent. I'm at the point of losing all vested interest in this game, it's corrupt as fuck. Probably has been for years but now it's blatant for all to see and nobody who can do anything about it cares.I feel similar. It was clear handball from 50 yards away. Did VAR even look at it? If they did the VAR ref is bent, if they didn't he's bent. There is simply no other explanation.
Unfortunately, I think you're rightFirst time I've seen the handball, from that it looks like it deflects from his chest and then hits his arm. Irrespective of where the arm is, then that's not handball in the current interpretation of the laws. Similar situation to Bournemouth away 3 seasons ago and Mepham. It's a shit interpretation, but technically not handball if it did his his chest (only seen the clip posted above)
O absolutely. But I’d imagine klopp didn’t see him as a ‘key player’ in the style he’d want to implement.
One of our main things will be replacing moutinho. We already need 1 centre mid without replaying him