The settlement will have been from his side when they told him he had no real prospect of winning the case. Which would have seen him known for guilt.
The fact that almost as soon as the preliminary actions to try and get her case dismissed he folded and offered a settlement, will be seen as an indication of guilt in the court of public opinion.
He won't be seen in public again.
objectively, your 1st sentence is correct. However the royal family won't be viewing this objectively, and won't be making decisions objectively either.Impact on the victims of Epstein and others >>>>> impact on Queen's Platinum Jubilee.
My concern is that senior members of the Royal Family knew what was going on and kept quiet.
Happy to be part of the 19%.Support for the monarchy Britain 2023, by age | Statista
Although the British monarchy is supported by a plurality of people across most age groups in Great Britain, it is among over 65 year-old's where the level is support is highest at 80 percent.www.statista.com
It's a monarchy in name only though isn't it? Tourist attraction and ambassadours, they have no actual power.Inetersting hearing Prince Charles talking about what's going on in Ukraine as 'an attack on democracy'. Which part of democracy makes you a future king Charlie?
Any time I ever see a poll like that one, on any subject, I just want to see the same one but done ten years ago, 20, 30, 40...I'd get rid of them after William - which will probably be after I'm gone, but respect at this stage I'm in the minority. If the lower age gap holds the same views into later life then it becomes interesting
This isn't true unfortunately. Read 'And what do you do'. Great book.It's a monarchy in name only though isn't it? Tourist attraction and ambassadours, they have no actual power.
Personally I'm completely ambiguous about them, they don't bother me (while lots of people love them) but wouldn't be bothered if they were got rid of.