No, I don't know that. Could well be true, but you're really only saying it cos the possibility of it fits your pov. Which is fine. I hope you're right.
I was just trying to correct Wolvensam's sneaky little bit of chronology switching, that's all
Correct it with what? Your point of view?
No... with Jeff Shi's actual statement. Do you not read the posts you reply to?
I think we may have enquired about players and he was one offered so we took the money instead.Seeing a few reports that Aurier rejected a move to us as part of the deal? Do we think this is reputable?
If true, looks more like a desperate filler than the magical upgrade?
I missed the bit in Jeff’s statement where he said we don’t have a replacement lined up or didn’t intend to replace him.
Yes, wouldn't surprise me if they tried to throw in an element of a swap and we said no. He can't defendI think we may have enquired about players and he was one offered so we took the money instead.
All guess work of course and 99% of reports online are utter bollocks
Seeing a few reports that Aurier rejected a move to us as part of the deal? Do we think this is reputable?
If true, looks more like a desperate filler than the magical upgrade?
I really just don't know what you're getting at and I'm not repeating myself again. I think it's pretty clear what I meant, and it has nothing to do with where you're taking it
And stop the fire sale panicking because of Fosun we’re stripping assets from the club they wouldn’t start with a £15m Irish right wing back would they? We’ve got far bigger assets than him
Other than Banjo being facetious there is not one post mentioning or even alluding to a fire sale on here. There's probably only Fred bothered about him leaving at all. Concerns are around the widely reported fee, that deal been done before a replacement is official and it leaving a small squad even smaller
You told her she was wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt when it could very well be she was bang on. That's what I'm getting at, do you not read the posts you're responding to?
The fee is an absolute bollocks. Whether the 'easy upgrade' settles immediately and Burr is adequate back up or not, the fee is an absolute bollocks. Absolute. Bollocks.
I'll explain it one last time
In her phrasing she put 'the club wanted to upgrade' first.
The inference (imo) being that it was initially the club's idea. Which kind of fits her perspective, and others, that this is 'all part of the plan'.
That's directly contradicted by the Shi statement, where he says all this was not in the clubs plans until the offer came in. He literally says this
So really, 'Doc wanted to go' should come before 'the club wanted to upgrade'. Language and detail is important.
Is that OK?