• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Loan Watch 2022/2023

On what planet so people at the club think that £4.5m was a good thing to do
 
On what planet so people at the club think that £4.5m was a good thing to do
Conservatively that's £5.5m in the bin, although I'd argue more like 8. 11 times the value of the ST increase
 
I look forward to the #askwolves justifying it…

There has to be a £3m+ upfront fee (surely!?) and then the “humble add ons”.

Surely we don’t sign unproven 18 year olds who are of near zero use for minimum 3 years for £35m and sell your experienced club captain and England international for £4.5m…
 
It's weird, you'd want a significant sum of money upfront to loan him with that sort of fee to make it permanent but in that case you may as well have just done it as a permanent deal on day one.
 
Thought it was a joke when I saw £4.5m. Have Everton paid a loan fee up front on top of that? (I can’t access the story as it’s behind a paywall).
 
Thought it was a joke when I saw £4.5m. Have Everton paid a loan fee up front on top of that? (I can’t access the story as it’s behind a paywall).
it doesn't say in the article

(I used archive.ph to read it)
 
It's weird, you'd want a significant sum of money upfront to loan him with that sort of fee to make it permanent but in that case you may as well have just done it as a permanent deal on day one.
Its all guessing we will never know the true figures.
 
Perhaps Shi and co actually believed Lage saying he was crap
 
Thought it was a joke when I saw £4.5m. Have Everton paid a loan fee up front on top of that? (I can’t access the story as it’s behind a paywall).
You'd hope so. £5.5m for a season or £10m permanently, but let's face it after Adama it's probably just wages for the season and £4.5m
 
Back
Top