I meant Corbyn, but I wasn't clear.
Re the EHRC - Political interference from the LOTO was seeking to expedite complaints, rather than impede them.
Corbyn inherited a poor complaints system that the EHRC accepted improved under his leadership but that it still wasn't good enough. There is also evidence to suggest that opponents within Labour Party HQ were working to sabotage the complaints process for factional reasons. These allegations are currently being investigated by Martin Forde QC
https://www.fordeinquiry.org/
Livingstone and Bromley represent the only substantial finding of any actual discrimination. However, both have very recently been granted a judicial review into the report after a judge found it 'arguable that the Defendant (EHRC) made an error of law in relation to Article 10 ECHR.'
Regardless of my points, do you think it reasonable to describe Labour as 'the party of Holocaust denial' or talk about Corbyn wanting to 'open the gates of Auschwitz'?