Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,401
- Reaction score
- 8,579
That is proper deep Pavlo! And also rather apt.
Likewise having great thoughts and ideas do not make a coach, having the communication skills to put ideas across is the key.
Likewise many ex professional footballers are as dense as fuck but blag their way into managerial positions due to their profile rather than their knowledge. They may have played the game without any real understanding of the game.
That is proper deep Pavlo! And also rather apt.
Total balls??? you can pour as much water as you like on a sponge, but it still only ever retains the same amount of water.
Obviously not everyone is going to become a football genius, but if you think that you won't learn more from watching 100 matches vs. watching 50 matches, I really don't know what to tell you.
Obviously not everyone is going to become a football genius, but if you think that you won't learn more from watching 100 matches vs. watching 50 matches, I really don't know what to tell you.
Obviously not everyone is going to become a football genius, but if you think that you won't learn more from watching 100 matches vs. watching 50 matches, I really don't know what to tell you.
Total balls is that. By definition more exposure to a subject increases knowledge of it.
Sorry Alan, I think you're wrong there. More exposure to a subject just gives you more experience of that subject, not increase knowledge.
Interesting debate on here. I'm of the opinion that greater exposure increases knowledge but can be hampered by an individual's competency in learning and how accepting they are with new pieces of information that may contradict previous views and emotional investment.
So whilst increased viewing of football can increase footballing knowledge, that doesn't mean we are all experts! Or able to apply the knowledge to new circumstances!
It's like languages, (I'm sure DW will back me up on this) some people are naturals and others speak a bit of foreign, have a conversation with one or the other, and you will know the difference after the first sentence, assuming you are any good at languages that is.
Necessity is what makes a person learn a language quickly. A hungry man will learn a language quicker, than a person who has plenty of money and doesn't depend on speaking a different language to eat.
Now you see i don't agree with that at all.
I speak French, Spanish and Greek, but not in one of them could I sit down and pass an examination even at basic level.
I learn languages not by books and teachers, but as a mimic. I could sit you down here in Greek and tell you exactly how to build a house, long before i could order you a meal, properly. Mind you i could always order a beer.
Some people learn by studying, Some by mimicking or copying, but whilst i speak Greek as well as i need to, in whatever situation,(including cypro night with the locals in a Taverna) i can't say I am a Greek speaker, and it's the same with football.
You can learn the phrases, describe the play, and discuss formations like a university professor, but if the game isn't in your head or your psyche, it's still just talk, and about as much use as a one legged man at an arse kicking party.