• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Transfer Thread 2014/15 - Everything not Wolves

Status
Not open for further replies.
This business of Podolski wide left really does my head in. Also doesn't Kovacic play deep for Inter?
 
If you're only playing one up top then that's the only place you can put Podolski. He can't play up front on his own.
 
Hernanes has to be in there. He's brilliant.

They've got a good squad again now. They just need to hang on to Icardi and Kovacic.
 
Hmmmm - Leicester are signing this young player Krameric, and the work permit is rated 50/50? I bet if Chelsea had got him like they wanted, the work permit for them would have been a breeze.
 
Oil money greases the wheels innit
 
Hmmmm - Leicester are signing this young player Krameric, and the work permit is rated 50/50? I bet if Chelsea had got him like they wanted, the work permit for them would have been a breeze.

They'd have just farmed him out to Vitesse where he wouldn't require a WP.
 
The Premier League has confirmed that Frank Lampard is registered as a player solely with Manchester City.

The league is also satisfied that the Premier League champions have not broken any rules over their signing of the former England midfielder.

Lampard, 36, was expected to join City's sister club New York City full-time this month having apparently been on loan in Manchester from the American outfit.

But now it seems that Lampard, despite being announced as a New York signing last summer, has never signed any formal contract with the Major League Soccer newcomers.

Lampard had actually been on a short-term, full-time deal with City for the first half of the season and that was extended to the end of the campaign on New Year's Eve.

It means confusion remains over what exactly Lampard had agreed with NYCFC, who had publicly announced they expected the player to join up with them on January 1, while Lampard also fronted their season ticket marketing campaign.

There have been suggestions that Lampard might actually have signed with the City Football Group - the parent company for both clubs - but the Premier League has indicated there is no provision for a move to NYCFC.

The league has looked into the matter, feeling it needed to ascertain who owned Lampard's contract to safeguard the integrity of its competition.

And, despite the confusion, it has concluded nothing untoward has occurred.

A Premier League statement read: "Frank Lampard is registered with Manchester City FC until the end of the 2014-15 season.

"The Premier League has sought and received assurances from Manchester City that there is no agreement in place between the club or City Football Group with New York City FC relating to the player."

City have not yet responded to requests to clarify the situation.

New York City said on December 31 they were unsure when Lampard would now join them.

"His exact starting date with New York City FC will be confirmed as the EPL and MLS seasons unfold," a statement read.

Lampard, released by Chelsea at the end of last season, has made a positive impression at the Etihad Stadium and scored seven goals so far this term

Hmmm
 
Looks like Jozy Altidore might be heading to the MLS,already three clubs have applied to get him.
 
*vomit*

There's a reason I hadn't mentioned it here. He's been an embarrassment.
 
Maybe New York City could get him to appease the fans after missing out on Lamps? Jozy has scored nearly as many international goals as Frankie and from fewer games as well. Could work out like that time Fergie answered the phone to turn down a bid for Denis Irwin and ended up signing Cantona.
 
The three interested parties are New York Red Bulls, Portland Timbers, and Toronto FC.

There are reports though that Red Bull have already said they won't meet Jozy's asking price.
 
The three interested parties are New York Red Bulls, Portland Timbers, and Toronto FC.

There are reports though that Red Bull have already said they won't meet Jozy's asking price.

begging-cup.jpg


???
 
I know.

It's unclear from the report if it's Jozy's wage demands or Sunderland's transfer demands but I'd hazard a guess that Jozy would ask for more (relatively speaking) than Sunderland.
 
He can fuck off at this point.
 
I'd forgotten Sunderland paid £10million for him. Christ.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top