Telegraph reveals another set of "allegations". From what I can see these add absolutely nothing. So Sam thinks the HMRC are a bunch of cunts. He is probably right. Nothing in the second article even suggests a hint of any wrongdoing, bar linking Sam and others to a completely legal tax avoidance scheme involving urban regeneration.
For me, the second article actually damages the Telegraph case and should not have been published. The damaging stuff is already out there, so there was no need for this article that looks nothing more than vindictive.
I just got home read up on this one and then was gobsmacked to find not a mention on the forum.
If this is true, it is seriously mega serious and the FA should cut their losses and bin him now.
Whether you agree with this type of journalism or not, Sam shouldn't be there and certainly he should have said (a stateley home)
on these subjects.
If true i find his comments re Hodgson totally unprofessional in a business meeting with people he has never met before, and would fire him for that alone.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.