And still is.
But he made a shit manager. Being a highly regarded coach means fuck all when it comes to management.
Wonder who's made that decision, is Warburton in line to take up a new job in the summer or have Brentford decided to look elsewhere?
Seems a little odd from either side to be fair, can't see any reason why Brentford would want to get rid of him and likewise can't see any clear openings come summer that are going to be massively better for him, lined up for QPR possibly?
Wonder who's made that decision, is Warburton in line to take up a new job in the summer or have Brentford decided to look elsewhere?
Seems a little odd from either side to be fair, can't see any reason why Brentford would want to get rid of him and likewise can't see any clear openings come summer that are going to be massively better for him, lined up for QPR possibly?
From what is out there, this is all Brentford led. Wanting to step up to the next level ala Southampton when they binned Nigal Adkins
Yep. Benham, being a blue sky thinking kind of bellend, reckons they should have specialised set piece coaches and pay much more attention to sport science, presumably because he has seen it working well somewhere else and just wants to copy it. Warburton has said he coaches how he wants and it doesn't seem to be going too badly, so keep your beak out. Result = end of job.
Tbf I don't think they were going to make the playoffs anyway, that top six as it stands looks fairly inked in to me now. Norwich and Watford are much improved from where they were 2-3 months ago (or if you like, are now starting to reach the levels that they should have been capable of all season given the strength of their squads), Bournemouth aren't going to mess up enough to miss the top six completely, most would say Middlesbrough and Derby are the two best footballing teams in the league, Mick should get Ipswich in the top six from where they are, knowing what we know of him I'd trust him. We could upset the applecart I suppose if we went on another really good run but I don't think we will.
To me it is strange stuff because while I'd never go down the Frank road of defending dreadful managers with abysmal records at all costs, you don't really want to be changing managers unless you have to. Put simply there is far too high a failure rate across the board when you appoint a new guy, no matter what due diligence you put in place. You can make an appointment which on the face of it makes perfect sense and should be a definite upgrade with an eye on the long term future, only for it to fail horribly. I'm looking at you here Mr McGhee.
Harsh.
If you say so.
Your title says it better than I ever could Frankybaby
Yes Sir Kenneth, but you gave me that title...!