It seems to me the FFP discussion needs a bit of refinement and specificity in order to understand Fosun's position and options at this point.
FFP allows for 39m in losses, to be covered by owner equity investment, over any 3 year period at Championship level, as we know.
Certain expenses re. Academy and infrastructural spending are exempt from being classified in those losses.
Amortisation spreads the spending on players over the lengths of their respective contracts, rather than being accounted for
in the season of purchase.
Morgan's last season saw a pre-tax profit of around 6m, principally from the Afobe sale, so that figure would be included in
any current 3 year assessment.
We dont know the losses incurred by Fosun for last season or for this season, and wont know until December, (??), this year for
last season. But for the sake of argument, say it was a 10m loss last season and a 20m loss this season, then one can work out
what their current limitations and possibilities are, roughly at least.
The formula would be straightforward enough: 6-10-20=-24m
But if we project the -20m loss forward for the following season if Wolves failed to achieve promotion this season, then a different
picture emerges: -10-20-20= -50m. At which point, the club would have contravened the regulations and be open to one or several
forms of sanctions.
At the same time, Fosun could spend another 15m now and bet the house on being promoted this season, following an exceptionally
promising start.
Alternatively, they could spend yet more now, but would then be in the position of having to sell players next summer in order
to come within the rules for spending again. Both the last two options contain an element of risk, with the latter in an higher order
of risk category.
My understanding of Fosun's strategic outlook is that they will not break any rules over spending, as they will not want to either risk
a backlash from the authorities and/or other clubs worried by the potential emergence of a rival to the top group, nor acquire a
reputation for the Chinese to flout rules. The Chinese form of corporatism is increasingly sensitive to the question of reputation as
they move into a period of intense international expansion on many fronts.
So in a sense both perspectives of Wolves being concerned about FFP, and of weighing up one more major cash outlay this season, can
both be true: whichever outcome occurs depends on the degree of risk Fosun are prepared to take in current, very auspicious circumstances.