lemonjelly
Housecoat, la
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Messages
- 20,566
- Reaction score
- 2,259
That makes sense (though still odd). In future, go with option 2!
It's because we use a scoring factor to determine if people get bollocked for attendance (occassions x occassions x days) and it does work to weed out the ones who regularly have odd days off here and there. It backfired here though as they changed their stance on COVID a long while ago to include it in that factor (it was exempt previously) as everybody just abused it, especially when they didn't have to give evidence anymore.Fookin daft policy.
Go give the brains behind that idea a massive hug and see if they rock in for work with a positive test.
My place adopted a very similar policy about a year ago, except for it appearing to be being applied very inconsistently, with favourites being allowed to wfh, & non favourites have to come in, or be off sick (& then spoken to about absences...)Work telling you that new company COVID guidelines mean that even if you test positive you can still go to work if you feel well enough so as not to have any effect on your attendance record. Then the same people looking at you in disgust, refusing to come near you, not attending any of your meetings and questioning everything you do when you do test positive. I'll work from home then cheers fuckers.
Exactly. I mean they had no problem with me being in last week while I really was on my knees because it was quarter end and they needed me badly. Now that’s done they don’t give a shit. I hate them sometimes.Just break it down to them in very simple terms.
"I feel ok but I have a massively contagious virus, with proof that I have it if you need it, and you have no means of isolating me from the rest of the workforce. Would you like me to come in, if I do then the consequences are on you".
It's just nonsense isn't it. People coming in when they were obviously ill pissed me off 20 years ago let alone now.
I went in because I felt fine (I didn’t actually test until I got to work) as outlined in the company policy. I wouldn’t be on a disciplinary if I hadn’t, I just have a lot of work to do and a lot of expectations to meet. I can only do part of that from home. But companies need to hardline their stance, not leave it up to employees to make that call. It really is a damned if you and damned if you don’t situation.We’ve had someone come in with Covid today citing they’d be on a disciplinary due to other periods of sickness within a year if they didn’t come in.
That's different from the usual, then?I literally had the people who make and distribute the policy telling me “Yes you can be here but don’t come anywhere near me”. Get fucked.
In some instances yes, but granted in some instances it’s the norm.That's different from the usual, then?
I tested because my fiancée tested positive and as we’d both been ill I wanted to know if I had it or not so I can try and keep my distance from the kids and not give it them. Work has nothing to do with it. They only knew because I did it at work as there are kits there and I don’t have any.Why are people testing themselves for covid? Is it work policy?
Why are people testing themselves for covid? Is it work policy?
Apologies, mate, maybe the wrong time for the joke. Do appreciate that you've been put in a frustrating position!In some instances yes, but granted in some instances it’s the norm.
No not at all, I pride myself in at least 50% of the work population not liking me, I don’t like them. I don’t choose to spend time with these peopleApologies, mate, maybe the wrong time for the joke. Do appreciate that you've been put in a frustrating position!
Brings back memories, sounds like it’s become even more draconian since I escaped.No not at all, I pride myself in at least 50% of the work population not liking me, I don’t like them. I don’t choose to spend time with these people
No apology necessary.