leedswolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,966
- Reaction score
- 3,647
'Saving for a rainy day'."The reserve"
'Saving for a rainy day'."The reserve"
Not ALL ultra processed foods are necessarily a problem if included in a balanced diet though...Ultra processed foods are a huge problem. In it them out (as best I could) and lost a ton of weight. There needs to be more information about damaging sugar actually is and how import the gut biome is.
It's a way of trying to explain all that in a way that is consumable for most people. People understand the concept of using an overdraft as being the exception rather than the norm.
Most people don't have an emergency fund stashed away, and the ones that do would understand the analogy.
If they’d set the qualifying criteria as people living in Council Tax Band D and above lose it I don’t think there would have been that much fuss.Not sure you can point the fingers in any particular direction to be honest, the criticism is coming from all sides and a lot of it is just points scoring nonsense.
The £200 to an awful lot of people amounts to no more than an unnecessary gift of public money straight in the back pocket. I’m not sure why anyone left or right wouldn’t want that stopped with those resources better used elsewhere. I’d imagine Starmer considered the changes common sense and would present as a Labour government showing prudence, but sadly when there’s a screaming headline or an opportunity to tarnish, the days of hoping for a reasonable debate around where the qualifying threshold might be set are long gone.
Lol at local government IT interfacing with central government IT. If we are going to means test then means testing it based on getting pension credit is pretty obvious.If they’d set the qualifying criteria as people living in Council Tax Band D and above lose it I don’t think there would have been that much fuss.
I don't think Shabana Mahmood is going to last long as a government minister given her performance this morning on various news outlets.
She got so aggressive too. I wouldn't thought as a barrister she could've handled it better.I don't understand why she didn't just say "look we all know why we've had to release people, but this guy should've been excluded, I'll cancel his early release and put steps in place to make sure people like him don't slip through the net". They make politics look so hard
Didn’t you say you would be happy to see someone stoved in this morning?The only way this could be justified is if it is the guy who threatened the MP with death threats and has an injunction out against him.
Meh, he would deserve it. If the guy who gets hit is the same guy who was under a restraining order then the MP's actions are understandable.Didn’t you say you would be happy to see someone stoved in this morning?
I take TSB’s point - of course he shouldn’t have done it, but some of the language directed at MPs is appalling.
I've seen a video of the aftermath where he's standing over him, shouting 'you won't threaten an mp again will you' or words to that effect, but tbh he sounded absolutely battered to meAlthough I do consider violent resistance a justified reaction in some circumstances, this isn't one of them.
However, it was bound to happen at some point. The amount of abuse MPs get online it is always going to happen in real life at some point. It's easy to say MPs should be held to.a higher standard...but people are people and this guy won't be an MP for much longer.