Squeeze
Quirkslayer
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 1
I take on board all of the comments here and this is a conversation that should be had, there is a lot of polarisation in opinion about trans people at the moment and a lot of it is borne out of misinformation and misunderstanding.
Let's look at the facts for a moment. A male cannot compete in a womans sport. However, a transwoman can compete in a womans sport if evidence can be submitted that proves the athlete has no unfair advantage. In McKinnon's case she was not a world class cyclist when she was classed as male. Now as a woman she is required to have almost non existent levels of testosterone - far lower than a natal woman. To put it in some perspective the IOC already have rules in place around this "An athlete transitioning to a woman must undergo hormone therapy and demonstrate that the total level of male testosterone in the blood has been below 10 nanomols per litre for at least a year prior to competing.The previous rule stated that, "in addition to reassignment surgery, the athlete required a minimum of two years of hormone treatment. How long it will take the athlete to reach the new cutoff limit will depend on individual cases" So, if you change sex, you will have to have a hormone level below 10 for 12 months and that's not a one-year guarantee. You don’t go below 10 from day one. It takes quite some time. It can take more than two years. The research done by medical physicist Joanna Harper has proven that once testosterone is all but removed and oestrogen introduced power levels fall enough to come in line with the physical capabilities of natural-born female athletes.
You may of course disagree and I will try to respond with grace, as is my way.
Let's look at the facts for a moment. A male cannot compete in a womans sport. However, a transwoman can compete in a womans sport if evidence can be submitted that proves the athlete has no unfair advantage. In McKinnon's case she was not a world class cyclist when she was classed as male. Now as a woman she is required to have almost non existent levels of testosterone - far lower than a natal woman. To put it in some perspective the IOC already have rules in place around this "An athlete transitioning to a woman must undergo hormone therapy and demonstrate that the total level of male testosterone in the blood has been below 10 nanomols per litre for at least a year prior to competing.The previous rule stated that, "in addition to reassignment surgery, the athlete required a minimum of two years of hormone treatment. How long it will take the athlete to reach the new cutoff limit will depend on individual cases" So, if you change sex, you will have to have a hormone level below 10 for 12 months and that's not a one-year guarantee. You don’t go below 10 from day one. It takes quite some time. It can take more than two years. The research done by medical physicist Joanna Harper has proven that once testosterone is all but removed and oestrogen introduced power levels fall enough to come in line with the physical capabilities of natural-born female athletes.
You may of course disagree and I will try to respond with grace, as is my way.