Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,267
- Reaction score
- 8,459
Anyway, putting doping to one side, I am looking forward to today's stage. Just starting the Aspin.
That is fair enough Donegal. Cycling has been a filthy sport for years and so the questions are always going to be asked. I for one hope that this is clean. The innuendo without anything concrete to back it up is unfortunate. Cheers for that Lance.
Bardet had heatstroke and just threw up in the medical car (I hear). He is going to be in real trouble on the Tourmalet.
With regards to Froome I nailed by colours to the mast a couple of years ago and debated it to death on here at the time (with Paddy I think), personally I think their is something definateley dodgy about him and nothing since then has convinced me different.
But why is he good? What he did today and last Saturday were exceptional, there is nothing wring with being exceptional, Usain Bolt is, but he was exceptional when he was 14years old.
Questions are being asked about Froome because of the facts.
He wasn't outstanding as a junior or an amateur and didn't turn professional until he was 22. In his first tour in 2008 he finished 84th, he now excels in two disciplines climbing and time trials, in that first tour he finished 11minutes behind the winner in the Alpe D'Huez stage and 3 minutes behind the winner in the final time trial.
2009 he finished 36th in the Giro
2010 he signed a contract with Sky
2010 he got disqualified in the Giro for hanging onto the back of a motorcycle going up the side of a mountain.
end of 2010 he was in limbo as Sky hadn't renewed his contract.
Question is, how from the end of 2010 does a journeyman cyclist convicted of cheating turn within 18 months (as Toon said he had Wiggins number last year) into a potential tour winner?
The reason given is that he suffered from a waterborne parasite Bilhazia which held him back, now they have gotten on top of it and that is why he improved. No doubt he had Bilhazia but how much you would improve after being treated? how long did he have it? are questions that cant be answered one way or the other.
You cant compare him to Quintana today, Quintana attacked before the bunch had reached full speed, a standard manourve. Froome had the speed turned up to max, then found an additional gear. The last person to do that on the tour was good old Lance.
I hope he is genuine and he is winning because the tour is now cleaner, but as I watched it the first thing that came into my head was that this is not normal.