Yes, I've been consistent about that and that our 4 shockers would still have happened without VAR. The whole premise of it is getting the correct decision if it doesn't then what's the point?
I disagree that the evidence wasn't there yesterday, it was, just not in the way it's interpreted. You could see he dived on the slow mo before the penalty was finally given, but because they choose to police it with the clear and obvious rubbish you have VAR looking at reasons why it should be given, rather than why it shouldn't. They want to support the onfield decision, not come to the correct one. That's why all 4 onfield decisions stayed against us. It's lurched from rerefeeering the game which it did in it's first season, like giving a penalty for the Mahrez dive against us to can we find a way to make that decision correct
As for getting more decisions correct, it finds things that people never had a problem with in the first place. There are offsides given after 3 or 4 minutes which may be correct in a technical sense, but I don't recall complaints about those prior to it's implementation. It was supposed to fix the howlers, not microscopically deconstruct the game.
