• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Coronavirus

Schools: Social distancing if you can but if not ah well. No need for staff to wear PPE. It would be funny if it wasn't criminal.

That’s the same in most countries though? At some point a small amount of risk will need to be accepted. Children have been shown to be much less at risk and much less likely to pass it to adults. It’s a sensible way to start imo.
 
It is impossible to implement any social distancing in Reception or Year One. I think it is ridiculous to be sending them back to school when we are not yet sure how children transmit the virus.
 
That’s the same in most countries though? At some point a small amount of risk will need to be accepted. Children have been shown to be much less at risk and much less likely to pass it to adults. It’s a sensible way to start imo.

Children suffer less but are no less likely to carry it. A lot will have it and not show symptoms. Staff will be at risk as will parents.
 
It is impossible to implement any social distancing in Reception or Year One. I think it is ridiculous to be sending them back to school when we are not yet sure how children transmit the virus.

You're not allowed to go within 2m of a relative outside but it's OK to be inside surrounded by 30 5 year olds? I'd love someone to explain the science on that.
 
Children suffer less but are no less likely to carry it. A lot will have it and not show symptoms. Staff will be at risk as will parents.

That doesn’t seem to be correct

Precise details regarding paediatric transmission cannot be confirmed without widespread sero-surveillance, however important trends are emerging. Low case numbers in children suggest a more limited role than was initially feared. Contact tracing data from Shenzhen in China demonstrated an equivalent attack rate in children as adults, however this has been contradicted by 4 subsequent studies in Japan, Guang- zhou, Wuhan and Shanghai, and cities in close proximity to Wuhan. These have all demonstrated a significantly lower attack rate in children. This, coupled with low case numbers would suggest at least that children are less likely to acquire the disease. The role of children in passing the dis- ease to others is unknown, in particular given large numbers of asymp- tomatic cases. Notably, the China/WHO joint commission could not re- call episodes during contact tracing where transmission occurred from a child to an adult. Studies of multiple family clusters have revealed chil- dren were unlikely to be the index case, in Guangzhou, China, and inter- nationally. A SARS-CoV2 positive child in a cluster in the French alps did not transmit to anyone else, despite exposure to over 100 people.

From here https://dontforgetthebubbles.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COVID-data-8th-May.pdf
 
You're not allowed to go within 2m of a relative outside but it's OK to be inside surrounded by 30 5 year olds? I'd love someone to explain the science on that.

Yeah, not going to be 30 though. Schools and nurseries opened in Holland today with half classes going on alternate days.
 
Govt advice on childcare and schools

https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...-measures-in-education-and-childcare-settings

The approach seems to be to keep children in smaller groups and be consistent with who is in those groups and to keep those groups away from each other where possible. Staggered start times should help too.

I don't know what else they can suggest or do.

We'll be sending our two to nursery as soon as we can
 
Unsurprisingly, there will be an "update" on the furlough scheme announced by sunak tomorrow.
expect payments to employers to reduce, and be more restrictive. they will force people to return to work.
 
Govt advice on childcare and schools

https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...-measures-in-education-and-childcare-settings

The approach seems to be to keep children in smaller groups and be consistent with who is in those groups and to keep those groups away from each other where possible. Staggered start times should help too.

I don't know what else they can suggest or do.

We'll be sending our two to nursery as soon as we can

Well they've talked about half classes for 3 weeks for R, 1 and 6 and then everybody goes back for a month before the end of the academic year so the 'small group's stage won't last long. It will also require enough staff to manage the kids that don't have any underlying health issues.

I wouldn't open at all and concentrate all efforts on getting ready for September because schools are going to have to be very different by then. This would end any uncertainty and allow Heads and staff to start planning.

If you absolutely had to open schools I'd get Y10 and Y12 in as they have exams next year and are more likely to follow social distancing rules. If you had to open Primaries I'd open for years 3, 4 and 5 only and have 10 to a class. Any over spill would have to be taught in the hall. Extra govt funding to allow schools to recruit extra teaching and cleaning staff.

Oh and PPE for all staff.
 
He knows seven people who have died from it apparently.
Wonder if they had underlying health issues?

Yes, he drowned, must have been the underlying issues that killed him sir.

It's not even worth discussing anymore. If you have asthma, and youre overweight and were likely to live another 30 years and contract cv-19, it's not the asthma and obesity that killed you.

If your 65, and have 2 underlying health issues and contract cv-19 and were expected to live another 10 years, it wasn't the underlying issues that killed you.

If you can't get your head round that, it's not the fact that you read the Daily Heil that stops you, it's the fact you're wilfully obtuse
 
Unsurprisingly, there will be an "update" on the furlough scheme announced by sunak tomorrow.
expect payments to employers to reduce, and be more restrictive. they will force people to return to work.
Extended until September but at 60% pay according to a couple of Dom's fave newspapers
 
It's not even worth discussing anymore. If you have asthma, and youre overweight and were likely to live another 30 years and contract cv-19, it's not the asthma and obesity that killed you.

I am overweight and have a weird asthma / COPD hybrid you don't get given a thirty year life expectancy, you get told the mortality chances in five years time is about 40% (70% in severe cases) , that goes up 10% the following five years after that, I understand what you're saying but it's not as black and white as that.
 
I am overweight and have a weird asthma / COPD hybrid you don't get given a thirty year life expectancy, you get told the mortality chances in five years time is about 40% (70% in severe cases) , that goes up 10% the following five years after that, I understand what you're saying but it's not as black and white as that.

the whole ' they had underlying issues, they would have died anyway' mentality embodied by

He knows seven people who have died from it apparently.
Wonder if they had underlying health issues?

is just disgusting. God forbid it happen, but if you contracted Coronavirus and died, I think I can say with a fair amount of certainty your family won't be standing at your graveside saying 'well, he had underlying issues, there was always a 40% chance he'd die'

As the Kinnear family aren't.

rory-kinnear -protect-vulnerable-coronavirus
 
Extended until September but at 60% pay according to a couple of Dom's fave newspapers

I'm expecting it to be restricted by industry too; those that were on the list of industries that 'should reopen' being excluded from the program
 
Back
Top