Realistically, someone who is clearly struggling that much due to age should probably should not be in charge of governing a major political power. It's like those old people who insist on driving when they really aren't capable and should be at the very least re-tested.Yeah, every appearance of Biden like this strengthens Trump.
It wouldn’t surprise me if we are starting to see the end of incumbency benefit. For much of our history, scrutiny and exposure of the incumbent has been fairly limited, I believe in the US the pattern has been that post war, the incumbent won unless there was a recession…during a recession voters know it is bad and blame the incumbent. Now we have 24 hour media in all its forms being the incumbent might turn out to be a disadvantage. Biden’s weaknesses are there for everyone to see and they are exaggerated.It's a lot of things, but if I was going to try to wrap it in a bow:
Incumbents are, statistically, overwhelming favorites in any election they participate in. Each party therefore has a vested interest in supporting the incumbent (given said incumbent is of that party, of course), which minimizes fresh ideas entering the discourse and stops a lot of intra-party challenges. Local elections are typically districted in such ways that the holding party can reasonably expect to win almost by default. Those districts are liquid enough that when a political seat does change hands, the lines are easily redrawn to support the new victors and the cycle starts over again.
I can't understand why the Democrats are allowing this nonsense to continue.4 more years it is then
I think the democrats should persuade him to pull out and put Blinken up instead.I don't know the intricacies of the system and technically he doesn't have the nomination yet, but it's too late for anybody to stand against him so as far as I'm aware the only way he can be removed is if he either pulls out himself which seems unlikely or he is officially declared medically unfit, which he's not from what I can see, just old