Tony Towner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 38,880
- Reaction score
- 25,426
The team that bought Neves isn't an affiliate of Wolves?People in glass houses… After Neves we, more than any PL bar perhaps Chelsea , should probably keep quiet.
Yet we were hoping to push Barcelona to £30m. Nobody else was paying anywhere close to £45m.The team that bought Neves isn't an affiliate of Wolves?
He was worth the amount because he's a quality player... £45m?
I agree but we benefited massively from their desire to make a splash.The Saudi League were looking to make a splash and "made us an offer we couldn't refuse" to get their man... The fact it was well above what we could have hoped for doesn't reflect badly on us, just the buying team.
We're hardly going to say "no, just give us £30m please"
Newcastle's ownership are in bed with the Saudi's, different argument altogether.
In bed with? Aren’t many of the people just exactly the same on both sides?The Saudi League were looking to make a splash and "made us an offer we couldn't refuse" to get their man... The fact it was well above what we could have hoped for doesn't reflect badly on us, just the buying team.
We're hardly going to say "no, just give us £30m please"
Newcastle's ownership are in bed with the Saudi's, different argument altogether.
Just savvy business on a footballing level. 30 soon and if they aspire to be a regular top four challenger he isn't the kind of technical level they need, nor does he have enough in terms of raw goal involvement numbers. But move him on before he starts to decline physically and while he's still seen as a decent PL player.Ignoring the Saudi element, it's exactly the type of deal the Newcastle Chief Exec said they'd need to do, bought 5 years ago on an original 5 1/2 year deal, so 90% of the fee gets banked straight as profit from an FFP perspective
Same goes for Trippier and Poppadom Wilson.Just savvy business on a footballing level. 30 soon and if they aspire to be a regular top four challenger he isn't the kind of technical level they need, nor does he have enough in terms of raw goal involvement numbers. But move him on before he starts to decline physically and while he's still seen as a decent PL player.
One footed wonder so astonishing price for one leg n'est ce pas?Just savvy business on a footballing level. 30 soon and if they aspire to be a regular top four challenger he isn't the kind of technical level they need, nor does he have enough in terms of raw goal involvement numbers. But move him on before he starts to decline physically and while he's still seen as a decent PL player.
Sky saying they basically want back what they paid for Trippier two years ago (about £12m).Same goes for Trippier and Poppadom Wilson.