Donegal Wolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,649
- Reaction score
- 601
It's very Naughty....
To me the IRF should come out and say if you only name 2 Hookers, there will be no uncontested scrums, it's been deliberately done to reduce the impact of packs at the scrum
No its not, your statement has no logic whatsoever, and thats aside form what Paddy says regarding player safety. Wales can hold their own with the best of them at scrums so why would they wish to reduce the impact of them?
If Wales have a hooker injured at the weekend then they can bring in Hibbard on Monday, if they have a hooker injured on a Thursday or Friday then Jarvis will have to go on the bench and be nominated as a hooker, if during the game he has to come on there will be no impact on the scrum regarding safety as you have an experienced front row man in there, infact with 3 props on you could argue the scrum could be safer.
But it would have a detrimental effect on Wales overall, especially regarding the line outs, possibly in the scrums if the opposite hooker can get a couple against the head and probably around the park as Jarvis is very unlikely to be as mobile as the hooker.
Its their gamble, Argentina have been doing it for years at World Cups with no issue.