Some of the football was pretty decent. The pressing was exactly what I'd be looking for from an England team, we created more than enough chances (got to take them of course) and while I'm not sold on a back three it worked ok, Keane looked very comfortable even when pulled into the channels, if we replace Cahill with Stones then we might have the basis of something there.
Concerns would be:
1) Vardy and to a lesser extent Rashford only ever look for the ball in behind, always trying to play on the shoulder. Nothing wrong with that being the general thrust of how they play but there are plenty of times where they need to be showing for the ball when the AMs have it and they just don't. Leaves us nowhere to go other than back out to the wing backs.
2) If you're playing three centre halves, two wing backs who are genuine full backs in their own right and Dier as a DM, you really could and should be going for someone more expansive than Livermore in midfield. He tried hard, he was disciplined enough but his use of the ball is really poor. You could go with Barkley in there and give him licence to play, almost like an old Brazilian style of five defending, five attacking. Of course we'll stick bloody Henderson there when he's fit again.
3) It's laudable to try new tactical ideas but realistically in our set of qualifiers...when are we ever going to need three centre halves? Are we really going to set up that way at home to Lithuania on Sunday? They're going to play one isolated striker who'll be lucky to have 20 touches in the game. So we either stick with the shape even though it's not really suitable for the opposition...or we have to switch back and forth and only really go with this formation in friendlies against good teams for the next 14 months or so, and we don't have that many of them.
I'd rather watch that kind of performance than BFS' shite, mind.