North West Wanderer
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 6,309
- Reaction score
- 12
The problem is that fans on social media are merely the vocal minority.
I would never hound out the manager but I feel the fans using social media have to have their voice heard when in it reflects the majorities thoughts/feelings.
The problem is that fans on social media are merely the vocal minority.
Its a growing medium in its infancy, maybe taking over the role newspapers used to fill for the football fan. So why not learn how to use it for positive effect.
Through social media can the fans start setting the agenda about which manager they would want next?
Rather than having an Owen Coyle popularity contest on the back of the local newspaper why not have a Get Gary Rowett campaign on the local rags. It might get a response eventually from Rowett one way or the other and flush away some of the uncertainty.
I think you've missed my point somewhat.Its a growing medium in its infancy, maybe taking over the role newspapers used to fill for the football fan. So why not learn how to use it for positive effect.
This is not positive effect, it is merely supporting your agenda.
I think you've missed my point somewhat.
How is the vocal minority going to truly represent how fans as a whole feel?
And positive effect. Really?
Put it this way, If the fans knew there was a strong possibility the next manager could be Gary Rowett the majority wanting Kenny Jackett out would probably be larger, thats not an agenda thats just an opinion and a possibility.
How do you come to the conclusion its a minority?
How would it be a strong possibility? Because the vocal minority put it on a social media site.? Really??
The chances are whoever and whenever our next manager is/is appointed, we won't have any sway on it. None of us predicted Solbakken or Saunders and not many said Jackett.
I also think Kenny is getting an unfair ride here. Sure, he's made some baffling decisions and I've questioned him many times this season. But now isn't the time to panic. Else we become one of the very clubs we've been known to repeatedly mock, who hire and fire at will.
A final thought, we are hardly an attractive proposition at the moment, and won't be until the ownership issue is sorted.
A final thought, we are hardly an attractive proposition at the moment, and won't be until the ownership issue is sorted.
Indeed and the arrogance shown by many on here as to who we'd attract is laughable.
Indeed and the arrogance shown by many on here as to who we'd attract is laughable.
Indeed and the arrogance shown by many on here as to who we'd attract is laughable.
Indeed and the arrogance shown by many on here as to who we'd attract is laughable.
A final thought, we are hardly an attractive proposition at the moment, and won't be until the ownership issue is sorted.
What a condescending load of bollocks.
You have no clue who we could or couldn't attract and have provided no insight into any process either. You have no clue what funds are available or even what coaching changes could be made so how you can say anybody else's opinion is arrogant or laughable is pretty pathetic.
Lack of a viable replacement leads me to say in for now.
I suspect there's more going on behind the scenes than any of us realise
However stop with the fucking about. 352?
What a condescending load of bollocks.
You have no clue who we could or couldn't attract and have provided no insight into any process either. You have no clue what funds are available or even what coaching changes could be made so how you can say anybody else's opinion is arrogant or laughable is pretty pathetic.
Looking at Forest, Leeds and Watford, I'm not so sure we'll be an attractive proposition for a manager after the ownership issue is sorted.