Johnny75
Virtual Cock
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 36,291
- Reaction score
- 12,473
We could swap Boly and Murillo for KilmanIf they did that and also inexplicably sold Murillo then maybe.
We could swap Boly and Murillo for KilmanIf they did that and also inexplicably sold Murillo then maybe.
We need to have a challenger mentality and be humble.His AI produced shite at the beginning of the season telling all fans to wind their expectations in as we're in a down phase of business and the club need to make money.
But be assured Fosun are going nowhere
Sounds like a you problem.Yep, largely agree.
It's the "shit", "Paul Blades", "Mark Atkins", "mid table championship" bollocks I disagree with, if he was any of those things he wouldn't cope in a 5 either.
Plus the constant, furious, masterbating over us switching to 4 at the back like it's football's equivalent to the football Holy grail, I don't get it.
Yeah Iād still have Boly here. Also ironically Coady with us playing a 5 , well, the previous incarnation of himWe could swap Boly and Murillo for Kilman
To be fair, he does have a point there.... telling all fans to wind their expectations in ....
If EP wants to have a pop at DWs judgement then this is a far better target than KilmanThink a previous target might just be out of our range now...by about ā¬93m
Because watching us appropriate Mark McGhee's football against a cack Forest team is infuriating, and we don't have a RWB or indeed many of the other constituent parts that make 5 at the back work.Plus the constant, furious, masterbating over us switching to 4 at the back like it's football's equivalent to the football Holy grail, I don't get it.
Or better still, Paulinha.If EP wants to have a pop at DWs judgement then this is a far better target than Kilman
Sorry for the slightly late response I was on the vinegar strokes.Plus the constant, furious, masterbating over us switching to 4 at the back like it's football's equivalent to the football Holy grail, I don't get it.
Having seen him play he really isn't worth more than ā¬25m and not really equipped for the PL. Just not quick enough.Think a previous target might just be out of our range now...by about ā¬93m
Because watching us appropriate Mark McGhee's football against a cack Forest team is infuriating, and we don't have a RWB or indeed many of the other constituent parts that make 5 at the back work.
But we have to play 5 because Ā£30m Max cannot play in a 4 (nor can Dawson at pushing 34, for that matter).
When we drifted to some aimless 2-0 home defeat under Lambert you wouldn't go "that was Dave Edwards' fault", typically. Would be more likely to be some boneheaded crap from Doherty or Batth or Hause or Ikeme or whoever. But playing someone at #10 who had NONE of the technical attributes to play there, but simply went on the occasional little goalscoring run, was a huge, fatal problem, week after week.
That's Max Kilman, a level or two up.
You would imagine that if Fosun's wallet turns up under one of the settee cushions this summer (don't laugh) and we spent Ā£30m on a centre half, he would be our best player in that position by a mile and a real coup for us.
Max Kilman isn't our best centre half right here, right now.
It's not hate, you just can't see what's right there in front of you.
A RWB, mobile ball playing midfielder and STR for 3-4-3; to work. And then sell at least 5 players.So on this basis, simplistically, we need to buy 2 CBs for 4 at the back (the dream!!!), or 1 RWB for 5 at the back...
Or better still get Semedo to improve his form to as it was when he had Neto in front of him - which is immenent.
There's just so much recency bias, and Kilman didn't even play badly yesterday.
Right, so you parachute Dunk in for Kilman yesterday and we win that game?1 x Lewis Dunk style CB for 4atb to work.
It wasn'tOr better still get Semedo to improve his form to as it was when he had Neto in front of him
Semedo was definitely playing better with Neto in front of him.It wasn't