- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 60,101
- Reaction score
- -45,945
How do you have Langers on ignore?
no, it simply demonstrates that even if there were FFP issues based on what the club has sort of said, the Nunes sale monies should still largely all be available to be spent. doesn't mean they will be or have to be and you do have to factor in wages. Whether the club was honest about the original FFP position is a different matter - we're all sceptical about that. I don't see how they don't know whether they've lost £60m or £80m last year for instance - it's a big difference.But that suggests there were genuine FFP issues, which the vast majority of people on here say is bullshit, and the figures suggest are bullshit.
So what are the club up to?
Think you will find I posted first but couldn't be arsed to start a new threadHow do you have Langers on ignore?
1 in 2 is proof is it? I'd accept that if he'd scored 1 in 2 over a period of 80 matches.Poor Sasa's 1 in 2 ratio.
That's some assumption you've drawn there, based on zero evidence. He spent the entire Summer thereNow Nunes has gone we have money in the bank available to us to strengthen the squad. The issue was paying the initial payment onnany of these deals, which is why Jeff was in China recently, trying to convince Guo to free up funds to use.
It's based on stuff I heard weeks ago.That's some assumption you've drawn there, based on zero evidence
if we already had sales of c £100m before nunes, i think it could only be a cashflow issue if they've used a big chunk of that to repay fosun loans. not even sure if that would be allowed under the £105m rule?It's cash flow rather than FFP. We could have sold Kilman to help with that but the manager at the time and Hobbs thought he was a key player and didn't want him sold.
Now Nunes has gone we have money in the bank available to us to strengthen the squad. The issue was paying the initial payment onnany of these deals, which is why Jeff was in China recently, trying to convince Guo to free up funds to use.
I don't think that it has to be investment, just a guarantee that they'll cover the losses. I did post the rule in here a week or so ago.Isn’t the issue about transfer money that Fosun are not able to invest any more money into the club. That was the gist of the postings by The Accountant. He said that their lenders would not allow them invest in companies that would not provide a return.
Doesn’t the FFP limit of 105m loss over last three years only apply if the owners invest 90m?
Without the investment isn’t the FFP limit only 15m loss?
How many players are you allowed to borrow from a PL club?Players linked with us:
Holding - in talks with Palace
McAtee - Looks like he is joining Sheff Utd on loan
Nunes officially gone.
Perhaps they can’t even do that.I don't think that it has to be investment, just a guarantee that they'll cover the losses. I did post the rule in here a week or so ago.
Correct - Kilman would have made a bigger FFP Profit than Nunes.Even that doesn’t explain rejecting 30m for Kilman.
Two registered at any time. Only one from the same club.How many players are you allowed to borrow from a PL club?