- Joined
- Nov 5, 2009
- Messages
- 52,993
- Reaction score
- 3,466
Guedes popping off will probably cover the Enso signing.
He's not dead
Guedes popping off will probably cover the Enso signing.
He is to Dan though...He's not dead
But Palhinha would have complimented Neves more than Nunes ever did.Boubacar is nothing like Palhinha. TT is right, Palhinha would've signed if we had sold Neves to Barcelona.
Value coming from reduced fees for two players also means less of a cut for Sporting...Obviously it’s not the £60m we wanted, but it’s a reasonable profit given Nunes’ inconsistent performances for us. Like others have said, he’ll be a completely different player for them then he was here, but that’s largely out of our control.
Add to that the reduced fee for Bueno & Doyle, plus a 10% sell on clause for Nunes, and I think we’ve pretty much done as well as we could out of it.
I’m pleased that, on the face of it, it seems we’ve learned lessons from the Jota debacle.
So we have three new players coming in immediately. I wonder if we can get another couple over the line? We certainly seem in the market for more.
Sounds simple but they get game time and exposure at Brighton that they won’t get if they don’t move. Not Brighton but look at Palhinha, it was widely known he was a solid player but if he’d stayed in Portugal nobody was suddenly offering close to £60m this summer.
No you are missing the point. It’s not about how we indicate we are paying for Doyle. It’s about the price point that Doyle and Bueno2 are being offered to us at, which are both big discounts. Put that discount on the other side of the equation and hey presto we have got the price we wanted for Nunes.I keep seeing Doyle listed in the breakdown of the Nunes deal.
Am I mistaken here....
I'm sure I read somewhere, (possibly a reported quote from Hobbs?) that getting Guedes off our books meant that his salary would pay for one of these incoming players (now Doyle)?
Does anyone know much about Jean-Ricner Bellegarde? Is he a like for like type of replacement in our starting XI for Nunes or will he just be additional competition? If we sign him, I'm hoping the former rather than the latter.
But Palhinha would have complimented Neves more than Nunes ever did.
Nunes never just slotted in to the team, he was played out of position in order to accommodate our better players.
Palhinha would have been an upgrade in Moutinho's position. He'd have worked as a foil for Neves as well as a replacement.
Nunes never really done either.
fixed it for you.Close to blasphemy. On pure ability, Palihinha WAS nowhere near.
100% Bueno2 is in the bag then.Alfie Pond off on loan to league 2 Stockport County, by the sounds of it.
Thought we might have been able to get him in to a club slightly higher up the football pyramid than that?
Also means we’re probably happy with going in to the season with 4 centre backs (Dawson, Kilman, Toti & Bueno).
Centre I think rather than leftThat’s a bit left field!
True, he’s a pale shadow of him. At present anyway.Boubacar is nothing like Palhinha. TT is right, Palhinha would've signed if we had sold Neves to Barcelona.
Bang on!But Palhinha would have complimented Neves more than Nunes ever did.
Nunes never just slotted in to the team, he was played out of position in order to accommodate our better players.
Palhinha would have been an upgrade in Moutinho's position. He'd have worked as a foil for Neves as well as a replacement.
Nunes never really done either.