Deutsch Wolf
Sponsored by Amazon Prime. DM me for discounts...
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 108,219
- Reaction score
- 33,192
Well it can only be one of Germany, Spain, France or Portugal for a start...
There are barely any easy games in the euros, Wouldnt say anyone can beat anyone, but It's not far off that.Spain haven't won anything since the Euros in 2012 (a pretty long time in footballing terms)
Germany haven't won the Euros since 1996
France haven't won the Euros since 2000
Belgium have never won anything
Netherlands haven't won the Euros (or anything) since 1988
England have never won the Euros
Of all the international tournaments, it's the one that gets shared around most equitably. This year will very likely add to the list as I seriously doubt Italy are retaining their title.
We’ve definitely had a lot of luck.Although I take your broader point re seeding, there is still a lot of luck involved. We won our Group as did Germany. Their pathway to the Final would be something like Denmark, Spain, France. Ours Slovakia, Italy, Netherlands, that is lucky. In 2018 finishing second in the group got us Colombia, Sweden, Croatia, winning it was Japan, Brazil France.
I liked Sven a lot but a lot of it was his own fault.I look back at those tournaments from the golden generation and Sven had no luck at all. Sendings off, key injuries, penalty losses, tough draws, keeper howlers. Southgate had managed to avoid all that so far.
You need a bit of luck in the Cup. Who said that ?We’ve definitely had a lot of luck.
I look back at those tournaments from the golden generation and Sven had no luck at all. Sendings off, key injuries, penalty losses, tough draws, keeper howlers. Southgate had managed to avoid all that so far.
I look back at those tournaments from the golden generation and Sven had no luck at all. Sendings off, key injuries, penalty losses, tough draws, keeper howlers. Southgate had managed to avoid all that so far.
Fair enough. Had home advantage in that tournament which is another bit of “luck”. Got lucky beating Denmark in the semi’s though with a generous penalty.Has he?
We lost on pens to Italy, despite Pickford performing brilliantly in them.
Wouldn’t even know who is injured at CB who would have played. And LB isn’t a big deal. It’s not like losing Beckham and Rooney etc.We've had injuries too, look at LB and CB at the moment.
As I said, the talent gap is bigger. Teams like Sweden used to be tough. We should be breezing past them these days. We’ve had favourable draws which we never really got before even if we did win our group etc.Avoiding tough draws has already been mentioned, like if you beat Italy home and away in the quals you deserve a better draw.
He's compounded the left back issue by not not taking any real cover, whilst having Gomes there as 4th choice right back, 3rd choice left back and 5th choice centre half.Has he?
We lost on pens to Italy, despite Pickford performing brilliantly in them.
We've had injuries too, look at LB and CB at the moment.
Avoiding tough draws has already been mentioned, like if you beat Italy home and away in the quals you deserve a better draw.
I'm rescinding this.We may be talking about different things.
Don't hate on Triple G, we've had way worse.
He's too shit scared of dropping the likes of Saka, Foden and/or Bellingham. Weapons grade simp.Talk that Mainoo for Gallagher will be the only change. If true he’s either too stubborn or too blind to see the obvious flaws on view in the 3 games played so far.
Not only is he giving up a sixth of the pitch as an attacking option he’ll be running players into the ground.
Or too weak to drop those that need dropping.Talk that Mainoo for Gallagher will be the only change. If true he’s either too stubborn or too blind to see the obvious flaws on view in the 3 games played so far.
Not only is he giving up a sixth of the pitch as an attacking option he’ll be running players into the ground.
No, you said Foden had never played on the left for City and had your arse handed to youAs I said before the tournament kicked off Saka or Foden on the right?
Lots who said 'play both, Foden on the left':
Congratulations, for backing the manager.
Ok, I was wrong and accept he"s had limited success on the left, against moderate opposition, but he's miles more effective on the right and fairly useful in the middle..No, you said Foden had never played on the left for City and had your arse handed to you
I don’t want him on the left but if you had Shaw behind him who can be a threat outside him, it would certainly work better.Ok, I was wrong and accept he"s had limited success on the left, against moderate opposition, but he's miles more effective on the right and fairly useful in the middle..
You said play both, with Foden on the left.
For England it's been abject failure and unbalanced. Foden playing there has nullified Bellingham (compounded by Kane dropping back into a similar area at times).