- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 58,143
- Reaction score
- 8,838
Unless he's playing CM he wouldn't have gotten a game any way now that Hwang has arrived.So we are deliberately and wilfully making our squad smaller and options available to the manager weaker? Ain’t that grand…
Juve have signed Locatelli on a two year loan with a 35m obligation. Quite astonishing how they managed that, but that's Juve for you.
Only jumping to logical conclusions, I see...Is Jeff trying to destroy our beloved club ?
Difference being I don’t think it’s a bad deal. Risk yes, but all transfer are. We’re not in a position to sign high quality players who are more or less guaranteed to succeed. They are out of our price range or wouldn’t come.I dunno, it's all a bit false equivalence for me (without getting into another discussion on Fabio, I think we all know he's nothing like a £35m player now, he certainly wasn't a year ago).
You could ask why Man Utd are spending £13m or so on a fee for Ronaldo and a further £480k a week when they obviously need a midfielder and Neves would cost less than that over the course of a contract, with actual resale value too.
Making one questionable transfer doesn't mean you just pay whatever for anyone else in the future, it's a crazy argument.
Also if we'd been offered Renato Sanches for free a year or two ago then most people would have said no based on how truly rancid he was for Swansea.
I feel like as an option in CM to come on for Moutinho he’s a better bet than no-one at all. He played well a couple of times in preseason in an attacking CM role didn’t he?Unless he's playing CM he wouldn't have gotten a game any way now that Hwang has arrived.
Traore/Podence/Tricao/Hwang for two spots. Plus Neto when he's back.
I wouldn't be against the deal at all if it happens (we're all guessing why it isn't going through, if he weren't on offer at all then there wouldn't even be a discussion to be had, so clearly there's some kind of wrangling).Difference being I don’t think it’s a bad deal. Risk yes, but all transfer are. We’re not in a position to sign high quality players who are more or less guaranteed to succeed. They are out of our price range or wouldn’t come.
So we have to settle for the next best thing. Alternatively it’s complete gambles on unproven players or averageness like AMN who will be half the price and fit everyweek but means we are paying money to stand still.
That’s not really a reasonable argument at all is it? You can believe the manager has the team playing well enough to finish in the 8th to 12th area and still be dissatisfied with the lack of backing from the board. They aren’t mutually exclusive thoughts so your point is a bit of a straw man don’t ya think?Evil Overlord Jeff Shi will destroy us all.
Two days ago, most of the forum had us down as a top half Premier League team based on performances so far, and I don't think that was predicated on "so long as we sign Renato Sanches".
Make your minds up.
I'm responding to a post that's wondering if the executive chairman is trying to destroy the club. How reasonable would you like me to be?That’s not really a reasonable argument at all is it? You can believe the manager has the team playing well enough to finish in the 8th to 12th area and still be dissatisfied with the lack of backing from the board. They aren’t mutually exclusive thoughts so your point is a bit of a straw man don’t ya think?
Evil Overlord Jeff Shi will destroy us all.
Two days ago, most of the forum had us down as a top half Premier League team based on performances so far, and I don't think that was predicated on "so long as we sign Renato Sanches".
Make your minds up.
Good point so why didnt we try and do these deals earlier, instead of having everyone flapping and panicking ?I hate transfer deadlines, just a load of BS that offers nothing other than inflated deals and a perchance for inciting shear panic.
You sound like one of my old directors who said he could never understand why we always worked on tenders up until the deadline when we could be completing them a week before hand.Good point so why didnt we try and do these deals earlier, instead of having everyone flapping and panicking ?
Because not many clubs or players want to do deals earlier. They'd just be restricting their price/options.Good point so why didnt we try and do these deals earlier, instead of having everyone flapping and panicking ?
I accept that but the bulk of your post was referencing the fact that people had said they think the way we were playing we can finish top half. I think it’s truly unreasonable to use that against them saying the club have fucked up the transfer window. It’s a pretty cheap and shallow argument whichever way you want to dress it up…I'm responding to a post that's wondering if the executive chairman is trying to destroy the club. How reasonable would you like me to be?