Operating with a bigger squad now...Having players is so over rated.
Will need some baby sitters to look after our subs on Saturday
They've not tended to work like that in the past - outgoings under Fosun haven't necesarily meant we have a replacemement on the way - the thing is, if we can help it Jimenez wont be coming off - if he does or an additional striker comes on it will be Silva. So with that in mind and the fact Cutrone wanted to go, I think it was always going to happen.Some actual transfer news!!
Does this mean someone will be coming in?
Yeah, I think we will. Especially if we want to play 442 at some point. At very minimum needs to be someone who can play there but maybe wide as well (like Guedes but not Guedes)Fabrizio says so which is normally "here we go".
Are we signing another forward then? You'd think so.
Kang In Lee?Yeah, I think we will. Especially if we want to play 442 at some point. At very minimum needs to be someone who can play there but maybe wide as well (like Guedes but not Guedes)
Lee is listed at 5'8". I would say that's pretty generous and not sure he could play up front given he's pretty slight too.Kang In Lee?
Meant to share this. Was hoping this would be good, but it's a bit of a nothing article. Does nothing to answer why being self-sufficient means a zero net spend.The article we've wanted for quite a while......
Wolves Transfer News: Why do they need to buy when they're owned by Fosun?
Fosun are focused on both keeping the club financially stable and looking to keep pace with England's best football clubs - it's not easytheathletic.co.uk
He's the type of player I think we should be after.Also - Tolisso is available very cheap. Injury record not very good, but I do like what I have seen of him
Yeah i agree, it tells us nothing we don't already know.Meant to share this. Was hoping this would be good, but it's a bit of a nothing article. Does nothing to answer why being self-sufficient means a zero net spend.
or why it would appear that we literally have to sell before we buy.Meant to share this. Was hoping this would be good, but it's a bit of a nothing article. Does nothing to answer why being self-sufficient means a zero net spend.