D
Deleted Cyber
Guest
I knew I wasn’t good enough for England but Eire? You never knew
1) they had two strikers injured not 1.Your argument falls down when the team we played last night had the completely ineffectual James and Gylfi up front. Both offered about the same as Silva last night
I think your point about Raul's general play this season is fair, but does miss the fact that even in that comparably poor run he scored 4 goals from open play 2 of which were top class finishes, one with an element of luck but totally self made and the other a good header, harder than the ones Fabio has missed.I think Raul's injury is red herring if for no other reason than that he was playing like shit for at least a month prior.
Poor Fabio is getting held up against the myth of Raul, not Raul the actual player. He hasn't acquitted himself well since his first couple of appearances, but I personally don't feel that we're getting significantly less from him than we were from Raul.
I know I have reputation for being negative about our best players (see: Neves, Ruben), but what I mean in this case is that Raul coming back won't necessarily fix things and we shouldn't be operating under that assumption. Improvements can and should be made tactically, especially in terms of how we're defending balls into the box. We have never been great at clearing the ball to an outlet (I couldn't rightfully tell you how often we seem to head it out to an opposing player who is unmarked at the edge of the box, but it feels like a lot), and with one less CB that issue is exacerbated. Couple that with Semedo and Ait-Nouri, who both like to play high up the pitch and aren't the greatest 1v1 defenders in the world, and you end up in situations like yesterday where you ship goals that are completely avoidable.
The good news is that, because said goals are avoidable, the ways to prevent them aren't soccer rocket science, and I still have faith in Nuno to adjust and nullify the problem somewhat. How that affects us going forward is another story, but IMO we've never been a team who can rightfully expect to score more than twice in any given match. Generally speaking, if we concede two goals, we're not getting more than a point, even with Raul.
Tl,dr; Nuno and the players have both the intelligence and ability to do better than they have been, and for now I trust that they will improve. If we're sitting here in May talking about the same problems, then I can genuinely see us moving on from Nuno, much as I love him. Crossing my fingers it doesn't come to that, as I think he is an incredible manager on the whole, if not overly cautious at times.
I would point out that Rauls injury added to the sale of Jota and Doherty adds up to a 30 goal deficit on last season which the replacements Semedo and Fabio have contributed only one so far in half a season or 5 if you count Raul. Those goals for plus the poor form at the back leads us into a bottom half position. I am not the greatest Rui fan. It’s well known on here. He doesn’t get us enough points . Pope gets Burnley points. Just a single comparison. Ruddy is on the wane and I don’t know enough about Sondergard. I think we need a premier quality keeper in the next year. Rui form has been poor for a while. He has had one good game v Leicester and that’s it since September.I think your point about Raul's general play this season is fair, but does miss the fact that even in that comparably poor run he scored 4 goals from open play 2 of which were top class finishes, one with an element of luck but totally self made and the other a good header, harder than the ones Fabio has missed.
That's 4 we wouldn't have scored in the current set up and it would be reasonable to assume he would have scored at least another 2/3 since which his replacement hasn't
How many of their 16 points would you say are down to Pope?Pope gets Burnley points.
Apologies, on second viewing it reads as more confrontational than intendedMy, we are in a mood today . I'm leaving this until you've had some warm milk and calmed down a bit.
I disagree with these 2 points. The first is too soon to judge imo. There isn't one I'd say is an unqualified success, but there were only Semedo and Marcal who you'd realistically say could have been this soon into their time here. One has been much covered and the other came with a chequered injury record which has continuedDid we recruit well last summer? Mostly
Is fosun in this to make money? No
I've never been Rui's Number 1 fan (although have always quite liked him apart from his kicking), admit he's been in less than sparkling form of late and coupled with his deciding not to come for crosses as well, but if we are talking about improving the starting 11 there are about seven others I'd start with before him.I would point out that Rauls injury added to the sale of Jota and Doherty adds up to a 30 goal deficit on last season which the replacements Semedo and Fabio have contributed only one so far in half a season or 5 if you count Raul. Those goals for plus the poor form at the back leads us into a bottom half position. I am not the greatest Rui fan. It’s well known on here. He doesn’t get us enough points . Pope gets Burnley points. Just a single comparison. Ruddy is on the wane and I don’t know enough about Sondergard. I think we need a premier quality keeper in the next year. Rui form has been poor for a while. He has had one good game v Leicester and that’s it since September.
And done it better tbfCould also mean that Pope has simply had more to do, tbf.
Yep you’re not wrong. But Rui is becoming a bit of an elephant in the room given that he is our highest wage earner or close to it and lorded as a world class keeper. For me he needs to start turning on better than average performance standards to justify it. Yes, I agree other positions need improvement but at the moment Rui does not appear confident in his defence who also don’t appear confident in him and it will cost us goals. 11 without a clean sheet and countingI've never been Rui's Number 1 fan (although have always quite liked him apart from his kicking), admit he's been in less than sparkling form of late and coupled with his deciding not to come for crosses as well, but if we are talking about improving the starting 11 there are about seven others I'd start with before him.
I think the summer shopping was ok - I think Hoever is a cracking signing. I think silva was good for the long term, Semedo is clearly what Nuno wanted so we can play our way out of danger retaining possession, Marcal was fine for cover and the two young loan lads are a try before you buy session. I’m quite happy with that, even though none of them have been unbelievable.I disagree with these 2 points. The first is too soon to judge imo. There isn't one I'd say is an unqualified success, but there were only Semedo and Marcal who you'd realistically say could have been this soon into their time here. One has been much covered and the other came with a chequered injury record which has continued
The second, they are. That doesn't mean they are bleeding the club dry or whatever hyperbole might be on Twitter or wherever, but ultimately they are an investment business so it's their raison d'etre. It'll either come from PL/European profits or selling us for 10 times plus what they paid