Just coming on to post that. Surely a ball carrying, creative midfielder should be top of the list?!
I do. I think he'd have replaced Mout most games and may have allowed us to go 3-5-2 or 4-2-3-1 as a viable alternative.I don't think Vitinha would have played many more league minutes than Cundle has if we'd signed him
He could have kept MGW and done those things. I don't think he wants to or in the case of the latter not with the players availableI do. I think he'd have replaced Mout most games and may have allowed us to go 3-5-2 or 4-2-3-1 as a viable alternative.
I just don't think we'd have played vitinha much if we'd signed him. Certainly not as much as Porto have. I don't think he'd have developed with 10-15 minute cameos.
I don't think he'd have developed as much with us as he has done with Porto
We'd have either had to play Neves or Moutinho semi regularly to accommodate, even then we're assuming vitinha could play in a 2.It's highly possible he wouldn't have developed as quickly but I think he'd have played semi regularly.
I was amazed we didn't take up the option and thought it was a done deal in reality but we were being creative to spread the outlay.
I know he didn't exactly tear it up when he came in and did have some shockers but I saw enough of him in a very unstructured team (attack wise) and in his Portugal u23 appearances to see he was a huge talent. Another very poor decision in hindsight but the signs were there that it could very well bite us on the arse.
It's because we've already sorted out a deal for one....lolReally surprised he's not said we need a CM. Maybe he really rates Cundle or Jordao?
Edit. And another winger? That's the last area I'd be looking at.