What else do we do though? Ignore scientific advice, flick it off and say Boris and Donald know best?
I struggle to get my head round the argument that a few 10s of thousand/Hundreds of Thousand/Million lives are worth sacrificing to ensure what? The current financial systems remain in tact? Politicians retain their meal ticket? What is it we would be getting that is so worth these people dying? Not unbalacing a very unbalanced apple cart? If we have any chance at all of saving these lives, surely we should try?
Questions bounced around earlier like ' so would you be happy to pay more tax then, and everyone wants it, till its them that has to pay for it, so answer me this.
Say 31,700 people , the capacity of Molineux needs to die to save the world's financial systems. Would you volunteer? Would you offer your wife up? Your girlfriend, your boyfriend? Would you kiss goodbye to your children, parents or Grandparents? Would you be happy to see them sacrificed?
If not, why should you expect, or condemn others to do so?
I don't have all the answers, no one does, but some people get paid a lot of money to come up with the best options, and it's their advice that we take the steps we are doing.
I don't envy them, and even less the people that are having to impliment this and I certainly wouldn't want to be them. I really, really don't