Wolves 3-0 Everton: Verdict Thread

[The Dude]

His name isn't Hwang-Hee either FFS.

It's clearly more thinly veiled racism innit?

*For the avoidance of doubt, it isn't. It's just a bad joke.

 

[Alan]

It's clearly more thinly veiled racism innit?

*For the avoidance of doubt, it isn't. It's just a bad joke.

Non-racists can do racist things.

 

[Shotbybothsides]

Fuck me shotty, which bit of relax and enjoy your old Age, didn't you get?
Oh, and before for you go on one with me, remember, never confuse me with someone who gives a shit.

Sorry buddy, thought I'd put a smiley up there on my post -.

 

[The Dude]

Non-racists can do racist things.

You could certainly interpret it that way, if you were sensitive enough and/or looking for an argument.

 

[pavlosmacwolf]

This thread has turned into a clown show...

I got lipstick for christmas off an mizguided admirer

 

[Alan]

You could certainly interpret it that way, if you were sensitive enough and/or looking for an argument.

No, I'd interpret it as racially insensitive because that's what it is.

Be the bigger person or find better jokes. Simple.

 

[Banjo]

I thought his nickname in S Korea was Hwangso?

Ah yes you can have bespoke nicknames as well, especially if you're a celebrity or sportsperson. Hwangso means "ox" or "bull", and they call him this because they think his style of play is really physical and/or he physically resembles a bull. I don't think he's particularly physical at all, but there we go.

 

[leedswolf]

Don't let's be comparing Hee-chan to Bull. Dangerous ground that

 

[lemonjelly]

Interesting that we were able to put on such a good performance yesterday with so much energy. Didn't know we'd explored moving the game by 24 hours;
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67852703.amp

 

[AndyWolves]

It's clearly more thinly veiled racism innit?

*For the avoidance of doubt, it isn't. It's just a bad joke.

Im only ever going to refer to our right back on loan at Rotherham as Dexter.

 

[The Bear]

I remember reading Hwang was called Bull when we signed him.

 

[Wolvensam]

90% of you wrote off Gary - that is a fact. We are playing great football under him - fact. You are rude - fact.

Some of the football has been great but it’s now whether it can be done for a sustained period of time, that’s the key.

As Johnny said a few pages back it was great yesterday with the angles and level of passing which really benefits Cunha, Sarabia, Hwang and co. Not every team will let us get away with that.

 

[Wolvensam]

I think in some ways Neto being injured was a bit of a blessing as we heavily relied on him the first few games. I would say that front three are on fairly level pegging now in terms of form and contributing to chances created/build up.

It’s a very interesting headache to have. I’m not sure I’d drop Pablo at the moment.

 

[Lycan]

I think in some ways Neto being injured was a bit of a blessing as we heavily relied on him the first few games. I would say that front three are on fairly level pegging now in terms of form and contributing to chances created/build up.

It’s a very interesting headache to have. I’m not sure I’d drop Pablo at the moment.

Sarabia has been excellent. I'd imagine Neto will come in and replace Hwang while he's away and Cunha will move more central.

 

[Haggstone]

Are there any extended highlights online guys? Yesterday was my wedding anniversary...... so.....

 

[pavlosmacwolf]

Sorry buddy, thought I'd put a smiley up there on my post -.

My bad, missed it.

 

[pavlosmacwolf]

Are there any extended highlights online guys? Yesterday was my wedding anniversary...... so.....

On wolves web site/wolves tv section.
A very enjoyable watch.

 

[BeaverWolf]

Are there any extended highlights online guys? Yesterday was my wedding anniversary...... so.....

Sky have a reasonable length on Catch Up. About 25 minutes I think.

 

[BeaverWolf]

Don't forget, there are hundreds of better managers out there

Really? Oh - you mean the ones on this Forum!

 

[BeaverWolf]

Is it not okay to change your opinion based on new evidence?

Or do you have to pick a position and stick to it rigidly regardless of what you see in front of you?

My point is that ‘mea culpa’ is the hardest word.