Banjo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2009
- Messages
- 2,837
- Reaction score
- 1,223
Mate, you made this same point in the comms thread and I'm not sure you know what a taking a "calculated risk" means.Traore was appalling in the first half but was playing out of position. Hopefully this puts the “calculated risk” argument to bed. We should never have been going in to two competitive PL games with him as our only option at RWB.
It means deliberately taking a chance after weighing up your options. That's what the club did. It's a fact. It's not an "argument": they decided to take the risk of selling Doherty even if it meant not signing a replacement before the season started. It happened. It's a fact. So there's no "argument" to have: the risk was calculated and they took it!
Assessing risk is part of any business decision. Would we have won today if Doherty had played? Would we have been able to replace Doherty with Semedo if we'd have turned down Spurs' offer when they made it in order to make sure Doherty could play for us today? Is the former preferable over the latter when carrying out the risk assessment? I don't mean that rhetorically: I'm genuinely interested in your view on that.
Those are the kind of calculations you take when you assess risk. The club will have to decide whether playing two league games without a recognised RWB and only winning one was worth it in the long run if it means upgrading on Doherty. That's the calculated risk they decided to take.