MARKakaJIM
Contrary Mary
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
- Messages
- 24,608
- Reaction score
- 3,448
What insult? You're the one who's called me a prick.Oi Prick cut thename calling. You can disagree all you want but stop the insults
What insult? You're the one who's called me a prick.Oi Prick cut thename calling. You can disagree all you want but stop the insults
:icon_lol: Please tell me you see the irony in this post. PLEASE.
What insult? You're the one who's called me a prick.
How do you define between the two?One thing that people should realise is that if in his report the referee said that Fer kicked or kicked out at Costa then that explain why he got a straight red. It does not matter how hard he kicked him, if the referee felt it was a deliberate kick rather than a trip then a red card would be the punishment.
How do you define between the two?
I'm not sure if they've appealed.With difficulty. Obviously if a player has a wild swing with his foot then it is clear cut, but the Fer one was borderline. Was it just a petulant action where he knew he would get a yellow card or did he kick out at Costa? Only Fer knows the answer to that clearly the referee thought it was a kick, but maybe he will change his mind having seen it again.
As a matter of interest have Swansea appealled?
I'm not sure if they've appealed.
In my opinion, Fer's action makes it look a lot worse than it is, it looks like a proper kick out but he's made minimal contact with very little force in reality. He could've been much more forceful in a less threatening looking fashion.
I would've thought force played a major part in Batth's dismissal.Sadly force isn't important as the Danny Batth decision proved. It should be.
I would've thought force played a major part in Batth's dismissal.
I would've thought force played a major part in Batth's dismissal.
Fer’s was never a red in a million years.
Side note: please cut the insults and name calling out. Thanks xx
I think it's a combination of the two, lots of force and little control can lead to a very bad outcome, one without the other is a lot less dangerous.I thought it was because he was off his feet and out of control. Bugger all to do with the force he hit the player with.
I think it's a combination of the two, lots of force and little control can lead to a very bad outcome, one without the other is a lot less dangerous.
That's why I don't think Fer is anywhere near as bad, his action makes it look bad but the lack of force means there isn't really much too it.
Perhaps it should?Fair comment, but when a player kicks out at an opponent force has little to do with it.
I think it's a combination of the two, lots of force and little control can lead to a very bad outcome, one without the other is a lot less dangerous.
That's why I don't think Fer is anywhere near as bad, his action makes it look bad but the lack of force means there isn't really much too it.
Force clearly isn't taken into account with kicking out, see Beckhams red for his kick out on Simeone for further evidence!
Fer wasn't blatantly stopping the breakaway, if it was purely frustration then it would've been more wild.Exactly, and even thought Simeone made a massive meal out of it everybody still knew that Beckham was walking. Same situation, Fer just kicks out through petulance exactly the same as Beckham did, it was nothing to do with slowing the game down he was just pissed off.