• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Royals

Just reflects their own insecurities - they are only relevant because of some long distant ancestor, they add literally nothing to society other than to drag it down with antiquated attitudes and ill-deserved government funding. These hangers on are a blight on society, Cromwell should have started with them rather than Charles I.
 
Twitter is full of suspiciously similarly worded stuff along the lines of "she's 83, what do you expect".

Well, don't be a racist. There's a good start. As has been mentioned by a few of us on other threads, there was shorthand for "corner shop" around in the 80s and even early 90s that you wouldn't use now unless you were a thundering racist cunt, "that's what we used to say when I grew up" is not an excuse.
 
Couldn’t think of anywhere else to put this.
It’s actually the real front page, I checked on the website, satire is dead I mean where the actual fuck do you go from here?
Couldn’t have sex with her in the bath, so let’s prove that while showing the bath is big enough for two, and print off some photos of their faces while you’re at it8C9310CA-052B-49EF-906C-E3E1932B3578.jpeg
 
"Great scoop Bob, but I'm worried no-one will know what we're talking about when they see the photo, it's just two random people sat in a bath"

"Hold on. Get me a wireless printer, some string and Google Images"
 
She doesn't actually allege "sex in the bath", just that he licked her toes/feet :sick: and they went into the bedroom for sex. So all that photo proves is what she alleged is more than possible in there
 
She doesn't actually allege "sex in the bath", just that he licked her toes/feet :sick: and they went into the bedroom for sex. So all that photo proves is what she alleged is more than possible in there
According to Andrew he never met her, and paid £12 million to clear that misunderstanding up, still more popular and doing less damage to the royal family than Harry apparently
 
Daily mail has two stories ready to go.
1. How dare Harry and Meghan overshadow the coronation by attending.
2. How dare Harry and Meghan overshadow the coronation by NOT attending
 
Daily mail has two stories ready to go.
1. How dare Harry and Meghan overshadow the coronation by attending.
2. How dare Harry and Meghan overshadow the coronation by NOT attending
I'm in the nice position of not giving a shit about about the coronation or Harry and Megan or what the fuck the media thinks.
 
Once the fury about Gary Lineker has died down, the same people calling for him to be sacked will be apoplectic that Harry and Meghan kids are now HRH Prince and Princess of Sussex, and 6th and 7th in line to the throne
 
Once the fury about Gary Lineker has died down, the same people calling for him to be sacked will be apoplectic that Harry and Meghan kids are now HRH Prince and Princess of Sussex, and 6th and 7th in line to the throne
Not sure you've got that right.

They're entitled to call their kids Prince and Princess but not HRH as I think that title has been stripped from Harry (and his subsequent bloodline)
 
Was quoting the official royal family website, you’d assume they’d know what they’re on about, none of them are called HRH on it.
 
Papers are full of Prince Harry arriving at court to defend his privacy, for which he is a major campaigner. This is the same pronce harry who has accepted £100million from netflix to discuss private issues, as well as releasing a book covering a load of private stuff (though mainly about other people).
 
Back
Top