• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Football News Thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Totally different case and a bit of a scummy thing to say.
Appreciate that you’re not trying to be a dick, but please understand that I am not harsh on accused sexual predators just for the fun of it.

I know what it’s like to see your assaulter go about their life like nothing ever happened, meanwhile you, the victim, endure questions at every turn. And you live with that experience every fucking day.

Evans and Greenwood can both get to Hell quickly for all I care.
 
Appreciate that you’re not trying to be a dick, but please understand that I am not harsh on accused sexual predators just for the fun of it.

I know what it’s like to see your assaulter go about their life like nothing ever happened, meanwhile you, the victim, endure questions at every turn. And you live with that experience every fucking day.

Evans and Greenwood can both get to Hell quickly for all I care.
I appreciate the explanation being a dick was never the intention. I just don’t agree with comparing non-convicted people with convicted rapists!
 
I appreciate the explanation being a dick was never the intention. I just don’t agree with comparing non-convicted people with convicted rapists!
Neither Evans nor Greenwood are convicted rapists.

They're both absolute pieces of work though and that's a matter of public record, like Harry Redknapp might not have done bird for tax fraud but it's blatantly obvious what happened. Not being found guilty in a court of law does not also mean innocence.
 
I appreciate the explanation being a dick was never the intention. I just don’t agree with comparing non-convicted people with convicted rapists!
Sadly, the likelihood of being convicted of rape despite being guilty of it is incredibly low.
 
Apparently Greenwood broke conditions of his bail, one of which was not to get in contact with the alleged victim.
 
He was dragged back to court for that
 
Big misconception around criminal law innocent is probably the wrong word sometimes can’t be proved of their guilt is more apt. Any slight doubt in a juror’s mind means they should give a not guilty verdict.
 
Is the inference there that they were paying managers and players through seperate entities be they City's or the employee's?
 
Finger wagging and told don’t do it again, or don’t get caught doing it
 
They’ll get away with again like they did the UEFA one I’m sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top