Stan Hullis
Talked the talk and walked the walk.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 16,435
- Reaction score
- 1,905
Joe Gomez is about the next best option.
Not that I'd do it, but Saka has played there.Is there not a single other player in the England squad that can play left back ( in the absence of Shaw ) , other than Trippier ?
Who is the next best available LB though? Chilwell? He's looked dreadful for a long while.With Shaw clearly broken, the failure to take an extra left back looks fucking negligent.
You know - that is a bloody good question. I'm really struggling to think of English left backsWho is the next best available LB though? Chilwell? He's looked dreadful for a long while.
Maybe, but I don't think you suggested he should be until today.Tyrick Mitchell - ludicrous he wasn't in the 26.
Correct.Five at the back means leaving out at least one of the big stars, probably two.
Leaving a left back at home and it goes tits up and you get shit. Leave Foden or Bellingham at home and it goes tits up and its career terminal
That's where I am at tooThe biggest problem is the lack of control in midfield. I’d start with Wharton alongside Rice play either Foden or Bellingham central and try Gordon on the left.
Wouldn't have left Foden or Bellingham at home, but neither of them 'walk in to the team' either, particularly when they are not playing well. In each others way a lot of the time yesterday.Five at the back means leaving out at least one of the big stars, probably two.
Leaving a left back at home and it goes tits up and you get shit. Leave Foden or Bellingham at home and it goes tits up and its career terminal
I don't think it's the formation or the players (other than TAA), it's the mentality and the attitude.Or play 4-1-4-1 and play both and Gordon. Depends on Rice having rather large cojones in defensive mid but I would love to see it