• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Euro 2024 Thread

You can't play like shit and say "well we were good in X game six years ago", what value is there in that?
I haven't done that.

But actually, you can do that to an extent.

We would all give Nuno far more benefit of the doubt for a poor performance or result than we would say Lage for the same thing?
 
We would all give Nuno far more benefit of the doubt for a poor performance or result than we would say Lage for the same thing?
Maybe, but I was in no mood to let him off the hook for going out of the cup to Southampton in his final season (when he bizarrely prioritised the league game against them a few weeks later when that meant nothing at all).

Love(d) the fella but he fucked up, like Southgate has on multiple fronts here. It's a week and a half since I wrote that piece detailing four tactical issues...have we fixed any of them? We've cycled through midfield partners for Rice but I wouldn't say it's working!
 
The racism is awful, I'm not attempting to trivalise that. I simply don't consider the 'anger' at Southgate at all comparable to what is a truly reprehensible act done by vile people online.

I'm not sure why you are posting those results, they prove my point. Which of those results you are showing me is 'good'?

Struggled past a very poor Malta team home and away while playing very terribly. Narrow win over Slovakia. Last minute win over Slovenia and they should have beaten us away. Scraped past Lithuania (incredibly dull game). Two 0-0s at home in friendlies. Beat a rubbish Dutch team who missed the World Cup and a draw at home to Italy. Those performances were all incredibly stale.
 
It's such a simplistic view. Look at our record in knockout tournament football. Yes, we've managed to get some easy draws and thanks to that got to a SF/Final, but it's built on fucking sand.

2018 - beat Colombia on pens, and beat Sweden, lost to Croatia
2020 - beat Ukraine and Denmark, lost the final on pens
2022 - beat Senegal and lost to France.

We beat teams we should - sometimes convincingly, others less so. As soon as we face a decent team we shit ourselves and play like an underdog. Looking at the route in each tournament, we've achieved the minimum expectation then failed every serious test.

That's all on the manager.
I must have missed beating Germany I a knockout gane
 
I'm not sure you are posting those results, they prove my point. Which of those results you are showing me is 'good'?
I'm posting those results because you're talking nonsense, we sailed through qualification, winning the group by 8 (EIGHT) points.

It's genuinely ridiculous to suggest we were "rubbish" in the lead up to Russia, but you crack on. You are well and truly proving my "entitlement" point correct.
 
Struggled past a very poor Malta team home and away while playing very terribly. Narrow win over Slovakia. Last minute win over Slovenia and they should have beaten us away. Scraped past Lithuania (incredibly dull game). Two 0-0s at home in friendlies. Beat a rubbish Dutch team who missed the World Cup and a draw at home to Italy. Those performances were all incredibly stale.
"Rubbish" but didn't lose a single game that you quote :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: and "struggled" past Malta away, a game we won 4-0.
 
Arguing yourself into a corner here defending results from the buildup to the Russia World Cup... They weren't good.

We did pretty well at that World Cup, there is some justified criticism for how he managed the Croatia game but I am quite pleased with how we did, I thought Croatia were simply better than us. I feel similar about the last Euros. In Qatar we went toe-to-toe with one of the best international sides and came out unlucky. I think between Russia and Qatar Southgate did really well, with some room for improvement. We have regressed since then and his strengths (managing the media, maintaining a positive atmosphere in the squad) aren't showing at this tournament while his weaknesses are looking more glaring. I don't think that observation is unfair.
 
Arguing yourself into a corner here defending results from the buildup to the Russia World Cup... They weren't good.
No I'm arguing your ridiculous point! I'm not even slightly in a corner, the facts speak for themselves.
 
We have regressed since then and his strengths (managing the media, maintaining a positive atmosphere in the squad) aren't showing at this tournament while his weaknesses are looking more glaring. I don't think that observation is unfair.
And I would agree with this.

However, we are still in the tournament, it could be a lot worse.
 
If you win a game by a 4 goal margin, you have not struggled. That's ridiculous.
 
From the BBC report (and it's a fair one):

England's performance must be placed in the context of opponents who are physical, resilient, organised - and ultimately the scoreline had a convincing appearance.

This was still, however, a largely colourless display until Malta, one of the minnows of the game with a world ranking of 190 and with a record of six defeats from six Group F games, tired and conceded those three late goals.

It does not make for the easiest task but this was, in large part, a conservative and uninspired England display, lacking spark and relying on Spurs pair Alli and Kane to finally make the breakthrough.

Southgate's side, however, have provided little compelling evidence in this group that they will make a serious impact at the sharp end of the finals, should they qualify.

There is still time for England to develop, but this has been a campaign short on thrills and one not designed to send fear through the first tier of European nations.


We were never going to LOSE to Malta, but we were very very poor to watch.
 
Likewise if you win your group by 8 points, how on earth can you have been rubbish?

Especially given the amount of times we've watched us struggle to qualify down the years, be it last minute Beckham free kicks, getting a point in Italy or not qualifying at all in 2008 and 1994.
 
There's no need to overcomplicate it; the bottom line is, when you can see that the team is playing poorly (as we have been in this competition), you know that the chickens will come home to roost eventually. That's why fans are disappointed and anxious.

I don't think it's too much to ask that a squad with the talent England has at their disposal plays vaguely entertaining football on occasion. We've been pedestrian and imbalanced, and it surprises me that the players are so thin-skinned about hearing that; you'd have thought those playing for elite club teams would have high standards and be used to that expectation.
 
There's no need to overcomplicate it; the bottom line is, when you can see that the team is playing poorly (as we have been in this competition), you know that the chickens will come home to roost eventually. That's why fans are disappointed and anxious.

I don't think it's too much to ask that a squad with the talent England has at their disposal plays vaguely entertaining football on occasion. We've been pedestrian and imbalanced, and it surprises me that the players are so thin-skinned about hearing that; you'd have thought those playing for elite club teams would have high standards and be used to that expectation.
Yeah I would agree with that myself too.
 
Not sure how Rabiot got a yellow for having his foot stamped on by the Belgian player.
 
As with England maybe my expectations are too high with these 2 but seems poor stuff to me.
 
Back
Top