Lycan
Jeff Shi's Bitch
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 17,940
- Reaction score
- 7,096
Mark Bunn? He was okay for Blackburn in the Prem IIRC.
That's the one. He's fairly solid which is all you need from a back up really.
Mark Bunn? He was okay for Blackburn in the Prem IIRC.
Bunn (first name escapes me) available on a free. Reliable back up keeper at this level, I'd like us to go for him.
A quick look at the fulham forums seems to be suggesting that they are more likely than not to succeed in their pursuit of McDonald, with lots of discussion about their midfield and where he'd go. The most recent post about it was;
Flatt is 21 in September, he really should be ready to be our back up now.
Well there you go. We should support him through his addiction then.
We have a history (all be it one player) of sticking by stupid drug use.
There is nothing to suggest he had/has an addiction. If as has been suggested he had a bit of Columbian at the weekend he was stupid but no more likely an addict than the hundreds of thousands of Brits that do the same thing and aren't addicts versus the small minority who are.Well there you go. We should support him through his addiction then.
A bid to possibly unsettle McDonald initially, but the only reason Fulham are more attractive than us is location nothing more.
Look up Chris Cornes.Can't say I'm familiar, but good on us. The science says pretty conclusively that a strong support network around a person increases the chance of getting clean.
Agent offering out his player who's only got a year left on his contract I'd imagine.If Fulham have bid for McDonald a second time (no proof there was a first mind), does that mean they have had encouragement from either Wolves or the player? Seems strange to bid a small amount more if they were told to get stuffed first time unless McDonald is interested in the move.