I think he's bright enough to know if Wolves can afford such players because by naming names he creature all types of conjecture.
Bully's role is totally ceremonial. I doubt he knows the details of our wage structure.
I think Luciano Becchio has been released by Norwich. Hardly seems to have played for them so was that injuries or not good enough? When he was at Leeds I rated him quite highly.
I never read the local rag so didn't appreciate Bully would just go out on a limb without having some basis to what players would be under Wolves scrutiny. Surely he would have a good idea who Wolves top earners are and if said player falls into the same category.I think we're bright enough to know it's just a throw away comment. Bull has a history of saying things like this.
I wouldn't be putting too much faith in Steve Bull's understanding or knowledge of football finances.
To be fair he didn't say anything about affording him, just that he thought he was the kind of player we need. Football prowess rather than football finance.
Dont tell Bully, Hull City have just released Paul McShane.
Dont tell Bully, Hull City have just released Paul McShane.
How would you fit all three in?
Well one is going to come off the bench every week, one of the will be injured from time to time and routine squad rotation when 3 game in a week etc.
Would the player be happy with that situation though? If it's a choice between playing 2 out of 3 games or being first choice elsewhere then you'd think many would prefer the latter, given that the two clubs were relatively equal.
Ive only gave the Watford scenario as a slight example of three working. If the kid is a top future talent as Akpom is then the scenario and the interview and talks will be a hell of a lot different, Im sure Jackett will not state you'll be rotated every other week so we can accommodate the other two.