Stan Hullis
Talked the talk and walked the walk.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 16,430
- Reaction score
- 1,905
Why the need to compare things to the past all of the time? Move on man, it's 2015.
I don't believe he's tweeting info, just rumours he's reading on various forums.Tim II has been shit today. He has spent most of his day tweeting random players names. No actual link or even a rumour just kicking out names. Been tweeting as a fan and not an actual journalist.
He will know the moment he mentions a name some will take it as a FACKT we were after them.
Seriously, I cannot compare now with then. This is piss poor! I support The Wolves now, as much as I did in '67, but there is a lack of ambition and an acceptance of mediocracy which I find hard to accept.
Seriously, I cannot compare now with then. This is piss poor! I support The Wolves now, as much as I did in '67, but there is a lack of ambition and an acceptance of mediocracy which I find hard to accept.
I'm sure everyone would agree with wanting to see them up there, but saying they lack ambition is a completely different (and unfounded) thing entirely.Wolves v Honved/ Spartak; Wolves v Blackburn Rovers ( FA Cup), Wolves 5 - Arsenal 1; Wolves 2 - Manchester City 1 (League Cup) - oh yes, we went from the First Division to the Third Division (again) and back up to the Second Division. Great! Call that acceptable for a great club like The Wolves? How low we have sunk, yet still I support them. Supporting The Wolves doesn't mean I cannot be critical. I love my football club and I could support no other club, but I would dearly love to see us 'up there' where we surely belong before I die.
We don't belong anywhere.
Totally different eras from then to now. Was it all about money in 67?
I do think Morgan has let us down in this transfer window, but also think that Moxey, Thelwell and Jackett have done a reasonable job of assembling a decent side with the lack of funds at their disposal.
Perhaps money wasn't the problem (well, within reason) and it was a lack of player availability?
So no LW players available in the world, at all?
Has Morgan pulled the plug then? Looking at it we are roughly £1m spent this window aren't we? Not quite the money (or player) promised to replace Sako as our esteemed CEO said*.
*Not having a moan at the business done to date before anybody climbs onto their moral high ground.
Christ, the common sense from Deutsch and Paddington in the last few pages sticks out like a sore thumb.
Can someone post a reasonable argument as to why the above post is wrong please? There hasn't been one yet and I sure as hell can't think of one.
I'm sure there are, but it looks like there are none which could suitably replace Sako that we wanted to spend money on as our CEO said in a blinding PR statement.
Easy - it does not mention the total lack of any experienced central defenders
Easy - it does not mention the total lack of any experienced central defenders