MARKakaJIM
Contrary Mary
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
- Messages
- 24,545
- Reaction score
- 3,400
Didn't he only sign a new contract with United in January? If so, why jump ship now?
Didn't he only sign a new contract with United in January? If so, why jump ship now?
We've never had a manager poached from us and I don't see that changing any time soon.
Probably a move to increase sales leverage by United. And anyway a lot can change in six months' time.
If he's the one we're waiting on that would make some sense. Jez probably would have to negotiate the shit out of that kind of deal.
I just can't see him leaving permanently that soon after signing the deal, he had the 6 months at Derby for some regular football now he's got pre-season to measure himself against the big boys and see where he stands. Wouldn't have thought he'd just jack it in if he doesn't break straight into the team, perhaps a half or full season loan first before having one last crack at the big prize.
It isn't bollocks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John de Wolf has said on twitter we're in for Groningen centre half Eric Fernando Botteghin. Fulham were linked with him at the start of the month.
It isn't narrow either.
We played 4-diamond-2 for 45 minutes vs one of the French teams with our second string. The rest of the time it's been 4-2-3-1 or 4-4-1-1.
And it might not mean anything this summer either. I still don't expect him to have a permanent move away from United in this window so soon after signing a new deal.Lingard played almost every game last preseason for United, too, and that didn't turn out to mean much.
And it might not mean anything this summer either. I still don't expect him to have a permanent move away from United in this window so soon after signing a new deal.
The classic Turner team didn't have two wingers in its 442 either, Robbie D was a winger, but Holmes and Vaughan were wide midfieldersSurely the seminal 4-4-2 formation doesn't have wingers? England won the World Cup using a 4-4-2 formation. I wouldn't call either of Martin Peters or Alan Ball a winger.
After giving up 2-3-5, Wolves played 4-2-4. Wagstaff and Wharton were the wingers in my early days. In the heady days that Frank remembers so well, it was a cross between 4-2-4 and a lopsided 4-3-3 with Waggy a definite winger and Kenny Hibbitt more of a right-sided midfielder.
I know players are fitter and (most of them) are more disciplined these days but I would never consider Sako a midfielder, he is an out and out forward who tracks back but can't really tackle, isn't great at marking and isn't going to win many headers. The same is true of Rajiv van LaParra.
Direct wing play seems to have been the way Wolves have played since the Nineteen Fifties (and possibly before). Playing two wingers, the likes of Sako and Van La Parra is more like playing 4-2-4 than 4-42 even if they show the formation as 4-4-2 on the TV.
That's why I believe it is incredibly difficult for the two central midfielders, they are always going to be outnumbered in the middle of the park.
The classic Turner team didn't have two wingers in its 442 either, Robbie D was a winger, but Holmes and Vaughan were wide midfielders