- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 57,806
- Reaction score
- 8,554
Isn't that when he's supposed to do it, rather than wait until the transfer window rolls around?Bruno is very good at talking about what he wants outside of the months of January and August
Isn't that when he's supposed to do it, rather than wait until the transfer window rolls around?Bruno is very good at talking about what he wants outside of the months of January and August
He has made no secret of the fact he wants a target man as an attacking option. Moore, I hope, was just a last minute panic and we will be a bit more picky when we do move for one."Physically capable"
Hmmm, does that mean kieffer Moore?
Seen quite a few Wolves fans rate Paulinha (not so much on here), don't get it, not seen loads of him but when I have, apart from one decent half in the Euros, he's been very ordinary, poor man's Alfred N'Daiye for me, I'd rather Cundle played more than sign him.Especially if Paulinha is one of the repalcements - unless the other is Kante its not going to be good.
I don't want us to sign a lump at all, I get the idea in theory but it never works out as just a player to use as an option when chasing the game for 10 minutes, when they play it just encourages shite lump it up front and hope stuff.He has made no secret of the fact he wants a target man as an attacking option. Moore, I hope, was just a last minute panic and we will be a bit more picky when we do move for one.
All about the options innit. We don't, and haven't had for years, a proper option to bring on a target player when chasing a game. No problem with us signing a "lump" to sit on the bench.
Depends on the "lump"...if its a Kiefer Moore type, then good god no man. A decent target man though, someone who feeds off balls into the box and gives us something to aim for is not a bad thing IMO. Obviously we also have to improve on our crossing, as most of what we put in would miss a 12ft 6" player.I don't want us to sign a lump at all, I get the idea in theory but it never works out as just a player to use as an option when chasing the game for 10 minutes, when they play it just encourages shite lump it up front and hope stuff.
Not sure about the Cundle bit but agree that he’s not been very impressive on the admittedly few occasions I’ve seen him.Seen quite a few Wolves fans rate Paulinha (not so much on here), don't get it, not seen loads of him but when I have, apart from one decent half in the Euros, he's been very ordinary, poor man's Alfred N'Daiye for me, I'd rather Cundle played more than sign him.
I do think this is basically what Fabio will become, though his heading at goal still needs a lot of work. He's definitely a good focal point though.Depends on the "lump"...if its a Kiefer Moore type, then good god no man. A decent target man though, someone who feeds off balls into the box and gives us something to aim for is not a bad thing IMO. Obviously we also have to improve on our crossing, as most of what we put in would miss a 12ft 6" player.
Not saying we should go all Burnley here and I presume Bruno is not planning to do that.
ASM is actually good though.My hair is only just starting to grow back after Adama leaving, I can't start pulling it out again with Adama II
Well, he signed the deal when they weren't minted, and because he's got ages left they don't need to give him a new one.As if we'd pay more than a clearly minted Newcastle United...
My hair is only just starting to grow back after Adama leaving, I can't start pulling it out again with Adama II
He's scored 5 in 27, not sure how that scales to 10 goals without injuries.He's everything Adama should be but isn't. If he wasn't so injury prone I think he'd have had at least 10 goals this season and be looked at by teams further up the food chain. Ultimately though we just won't spend the inflated fee that is attributed when buying from Premier League clubs so it's a non starter.