Agree, although I think Robinson is decent himself. If it's one or the other has to be RayanRAN is better than Robinson.
French teams often seem happy to take back players who haven't worked out elsewhere. He's a known quantity there; surely someone in that league would be interested in taking a punt. Whether they can match the wages we pay him is another question.Maybe Marcal is off? Can't think who would sign him. I think Robinson might have a cheap release clause?
We'll need RAN and one other next season though I guess. Jonny should be back but a double ACL in the same knee means he'll be a risk.Yeah, we're as well keeping him. We'd get nothing for a 32 year old of questionable fitness with one year left on his deal.
We definitely don't need RAN AND Robinson. Entirely pointless.
Don’t really see much difference between Saiss and Marcal. Both sound technically, decent defenders, no real pace. Saiss isn’t going to play anywhere else. His role is backup left sided defender for me.I love Romain but he should never be played in a wide position, ever ever ever. I know he acquitted himself decently in one or two tough spots in that position but playing him there should never be a plan, only ever a contingency.
No thanks.I’d rather just play Saiss in an emergency than blow £10m plus wages on a third (4th) choice FB.
If you're signing RAN on the mooted deal and you're that bothered about Marçal/Jonny then you don't pay the same for someone of more or less exactly the same profile. Sign him then get some cheap back up.