Spoilt Princesses moaning about Media Coverage of Wolves

[jd1981]

No Barry Douglas? I’d only probably leave three out current side Murray for Ruddy, Lescott for Bennett and maybe Rae for Saiss.

 

[YoungWolf]

Oh yes, Rae is a good shout actually. Though he didn't play as much that season did he? Was mainly Cameron and Ince in midfield?

 

[Tredman]

Foley needs to be in there all day long.

 

[The Bear]

I'd have Cameron over Rae anyway personally.

 

[Tredman]

Suppose it depends on what formation you're playing , for 3-4-3 its hard to beat Neves & Saiss

 

[jd1981]

I suppose you have to look at how good players were in the promotion seasons as oppose to their entire time here.
Foley was excellent in that promotion year and SEB was on fire also. Problem with the sides of 03 and 09 was they were built for promotion and needed investment again just to survive.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

You struggle to compare some of the current lot as we play such a wildly different system but Doherty as an orthodox RB over Foley is an absolute casserole of nonsense. I didn't like Irwin down here but even at the age of 72 he was a better full back than Doc.

 

[Penk Wolf]

Murray; Foley, Boly, Lescott, Ward; Neves, Saiss; Kightly, Jota, Cav; Ebanks-Blake.

Saiss just gets in ahead of Rae.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

You struggle to compare some of the current lot as we play such a wildly different system but Doherty as an orthodox RB over Foley is an absolute casserole of nonsense. I didn't like Irwin down here but even at the age of 72 he was a better full back than Doc.

As a wing back though, Doc is better than Foley, as you say depends on formation. That looks like 451 though.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Spiers still suggesting Cav isn't consistent.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

Spiers still suggesting Cav isn't consistent.

Hmmm.

Jarvis only started 21 of our 46 league games in 2008/9 and scored a whole three goals. I'd say consistency was more of an issue then for him than it is now for Cav.

 

[Jinky]

Murray; Foley, Boly, Lescott, Douglas; Neves, Rae; Kightly, Jota, Cav; Ebanks-Blake.

I'd go with that.

 

[machin05]

People used to throw that accusation at Sako too. Baffling.

 

[The Saturday Boy]

Murray and Lescott instead of Ruddy and Batth/Bennett - aside from those two changes this team is way ahead of that team in every other area. It isn't even close.

 

[Wombat del combate]

an absolute casserole of nonsense.

Magnificent. :tiphat:

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

If we were going 3-4-3:

-----------------Murray---------------

--------Boly-----Coady----Lescott-----

Doherty----Neves-----Rae-------Douglas

------Kightly----Miller-----Jota-----------

No 4-4-2, no party for SEB.

 

[Penk Wolf]

If we were going 3-4-3:

-----------------Murray---------------

--------Boly-----Coady----Lescott-----

Doherty----Neves-----Rae-------Douglas

------Kightly----Miller-----Jota-----------

No 4-4-2, no party for SEB.

Quick frame it, Doherty in one of DW's best 11.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

Irwin, Edworthy or Foley were my alternatives. Doubt they played five games at wing back between them in their whole careers. For good reason.

De-fault, de-fault, de-fault.

 

[Keef]

If we were going 3-4-3:

-----------------Murray---------------

--------Boly-----Coady----Lescott-----

Doherty----Neves-----Rae-------Douglas

------Kightly----Miller-----Jota-----------

No 4-4-2, no party for SEB.

That's a good team,bar one forward player,but that's a personal issue,and a fairly good story behind it,even if I do say so myself,
See below

 

[Langers]

It's given me a laugh on Twitter anyway :icon_lol: